500. IRS raid (8/3/07)
In later March, I learned from my bank statement that IRS has added a refund at the balance. I think it was a tactic Feds tried to tie me to my wife's tax file. A trick to push me to file my own to separate from my wife's. If there were two conflict tax files, then Feds could do a field raid (in the name of IRS). I didn't react.
Then in early April, my wife noticed me that IRS would withdraw thousand of dollars from my account. It was interesting to observe the psychology of the Feds. When they saw I didn't response, they thought that was because increasing balance wouldn't touch me. They immediately change the method by decreasing the balance. But I would not know there was a withdrawal until in later April when I received monthly statement. What Feds wanted was to push me filing another tax return. The final date was 4/17. So they let my wife inform me orally. How could she know what IRS would do on my account?
At same time, there was something unusual happened.
In later March, my wife told me that Lady R.P. (a relative of hers who live in Philippines) having a trip in US and would live at my home for several days. Lady R.P. had stayed at my home for a short period 17 years ago. She didn't come this time anyway. Then in early April, Mrs. Mao visited my house. She said she intended to live at my house for several days too. (Mrs. Mao was my tenant about 20 years ago.) The sudden requests to live at my house were unusual, apparently it was arranged by Feds. What was their purpose? I puzzled.
A rain forecast solved my problem.
In that period, for continual Saturdays, the weather forecast reported rain. It was evident when there was only one rain logo (for Saturday) compare with other days' sun logo. I knew why. It was a trick to frame my brother in law to a drug case. His merchandise - umbrella - came from China. Secret police must have planted drug in it. My brother in law would deliver umbrella himself at week-ends when his employee were on vacation
Anyhow, there was little rain on Saturdays because Feds had to frame me first. Then I saw a change. On 4/9, it forecast 4/11 (Wednesday) as rain day. I was watchful on rain days because I collect rain water. (Feds has poisoned tap water and sometimes contaminated it
with radioactive material.) I knew Feds controlled the weather these particular days, they had no reason to supply me the water I needed. So there was other purpose.
I worried there would be a house raid in the name of "IRS". Should I collect rainwater on Wednesday? Then the raid team could coincidentally meet me at front yard. All of a sudden, I solved the puzzle of request to "live at my house".
I don't answer the door when I am home alone. "IRS" team may not enter my home unless there was someone else at the house. So Feds planted someone to answer the door. But why they changed Lady R.P. with Mrs. Mao? Because Lady R.P. speaks English. The search, anyhow, would be an unreasonable search. There would be argument. Feds didn't want a witness telling the truth. So they changed her by Mrs. Mao - an old Chinese lady speaks little English. And finally, they decided no one should witness the truth. They thought of rain.
Feds really did a lot of work in April plot. They manipulated IRS to access my bank account in a month, by first adding some money then withdrawing some. They really studied my behavior and relative history by picking up two people whom had once lived at my house so I could hardly refuse their request. I surprisingly saw how quickly they changed their scheme several times by answer door people to natural rain.
I didn't do to the Feds' wish. So there was little rain and no one come to live at my house in the end.
If everything went on to their plan, Virginia Tech would have a terror bombing to distract in early April. That's how we saw bombing threat from 4/2 to 4/13. (see #494)
501. Surveillance without warrant (8/8/07)
The honorable Senator
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator
I'm writing you to oppose the newly passed law (Passed in Senate on Aug. 3, signed by Bush on Aug. 5) which gives government expanded surveillance authority without court approval.
I urge you to re-consider the law because of the following reason:
1. The proposed bill is a violation of the Constitution and an affront to our civil rights as US citizens. It especially damaged the Fourth Amendment which protecting people from unreasonable search and arrest.
It's easy for coruptive police to manipulate a "terrorist suspect" to e-mail, or dialogue in an internet forum, to frame innocent people. (In Miame terror cell case of 2006, a FBI informant had instructed the cell member to attack FBI office ).
2. There is no reason to say old FISA rule doesn't work. Under which the government can do eavesdropping any time when it requires. Even if it's in emergence, they can wiretap first and submit an application to court later. Nothing hinder their surveillance work.
A surveillance without warrant means a blank check to the secret police. It opens the door to a fascist country.
3. Surveillance not only means eavesdropping, it also means harassment. FBI, DEA are notorious for abusing power. They harass, plant and frame case. There is lack of a surveillance on these so said "law enforcement". The new law gives them further more room for abusing power. It is an attack on the principle of Check and Balance.
4. A negative side of this law from my personal experience. I posted a lot in internet web forum. I used to reveal the dark side of the government, especially about the law enforcement. I suffered continuous harassment from the Feds cyberspace team. Recently I was blocked from three web sites. (two of them are media's web site)
(1) On Aug. 1, blocked to enter "http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm9 " by technical problem.
(2) On Aug. 4, banned to enter "http://forum.signonsandiego.com/upload/index.php?"
(3) On Aug. 5, banned to enter "http://forums.shoutwire.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=7"
Since my posting were all of political opinion, there was no reason to ban me accessing the site. The ban is so thorough that I couldn't complain nor read. I allege it was from surveillance team not from the web site. I think it was done when Feds (FBI, DEA) has been inspired and encouraged by the would passing new surveillance law.
In conclusion, I urge you to re-consider the new intelligence surveillance law, at least do some amendment to limit the unrestricted power of law enforcement. I also urge you to investigate the abusing in internet communication caused by the Feds (FBI, DEA). (see below)
Sincerely
Kat Hak Sung
--------------
Harassment
More complain about law enforcement internet abusing.
1. Made my article unreadable by misplacing the paragraph:
http://anyboard.net/gov/pol/USpolitics/posts/26900.html
http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc...ival=&posts=35
http://www.islamonline.net/discussio...ID=80356#80356
2. Block to enter the forum by various tech. problem. (such like frozen the window frame, blank frame, url changing, function losing, etc. )
http://www.kgw.com/threadsdisabled.html
http://fff.fathom.org/forums/
http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/WebX?caller-14@194.uUR6aWpjb5a^2@.ee6d2e3
http://asiansinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15
http://slate.msn.com/code/theFray/theFray.asp
http://thefiringrange.com/forum/disp....asp?ForumID=2
http://www.vnn.org/forums/index.html
http://www.darkconspiracy.com/board/
http://news.bostonherald.com/forums/
http://forums.cal.alachua.fl.us/
http://www.marke****ch.com/discussio...&boardId=21288
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=2
3. Ban in a rogue's way:
http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?p=246086
<DIR>
"You have been banned for the following reason:
None
</DIR>
Date the ban will be lifted: Never"
This is not a normal web site notice but a rogue's reply - a typical Feds' style.
4. Block to post by "incorrect password"
http://www.al.com/forums/
http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-elinthenews
http://www.matrixcommunity.org/cgi-b...?ubb=forum;f=1
http://talk.philmusic.com/board/view...91c98231c78bb1
http://www.v-switzerland.com/forums/
5. Intercept e-mail.
Complain e-mail returned. Application e-mail and enquire e-mail no answer.
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=12293>