510. A nuclear attack in August plot (9/23/07)
9/6, under the briefing news about Rep. Paul Gillmor's death, Mercury News also reported: "Nuclear warheads flown between bases in error
A B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more then three hours across several states last week,.....
The plane carried Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D. to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug 30."
Then in same internet article, I learned that in military procedure, nuclear weapons must be shipped on the ground in the continental US in case there is an accident.
Re: "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?
September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57
Now we learn that on August 30th, six nuclear warheads were "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. (Five arrived, did one get "lost"? Or is someone unable to count?) This violates all military procedure, which requires that nuclear weapons always be shipped on the ground in the continental US, so that if there's an accident, a bomb detonation won't occur. It would take an order from the Commander-in-Chief to put nukes on a plane.
The warheads were reportedly fastened to cruise missiles, which have a range of 1500-2000 miles. Not enough to cross the Atlantic, but enough to hit cities in the US as part of a false flag operation. This scenario is being claimed by "military investigators" on the Hal Turner show, and is making its way around the internet. It's being said the plan was to hit 5 American cities with nuclear weapons over Labor Day weekend in order to install martial law. If so, we have been saved by the grace of God, operating through loyal American whistleblowers, who made the "accidental shipment" of nuclear warheads public."
http://www.opednews.com/articles/ope..._what_s_go.htm
If you are a regular reader of my journal, you know as early as 8/18 I have predicted that 8/31 to 9/3 would be the action day of the August plot.(the day when Bay Bridge closed) I also repeatedly alleged there would be false flag terror attack (likely dirty bomb attack or nuclear weapon attack) to distract the framed case. This news proves my allegation. The attack would be from the government insider not from Islamic terrorist. It also alerted me that I under-estimated the Feds. Their tactic is not distract but pre-distract.
In distract case, a framed drug case broke off. Suspects died in arrest or in custody. Then terror attack follows to distract, turns public attention away from the case. But the news of drug case would leave trace in some people's mind.
In pre-distract case, something bigger takes place in advance of the framed case. Next day, when people are in the peak of panic, any other news would be ignored. Or, most likely, there is no report on any other small news (small compare to a nuclear bombing, and there are six of them. You can imagine how many pages and times spent by media to cover up the scene of each bombed city) No one knows about the drug case. Pre-distract is a thorough censorship.
I have predicted 4/17 as action day of April plot. (The last day for file a tax return) There was a massacre in Virginia Tech which shocked the whole country on 4/16.
I have predicted 8/31 to 9/3 as action day of August plot. (Bay Bridge closed) There was an attempted nuclear bombing incident on 8/30. All planned one day before the main action day. So the pre-distract plays its utmost.
I think my continuous revelation soured the plot. If their plan went through, six US cities would have been destroyed, Feds would take over the states with Martial law. A framed drug case in California next day, would sink into oblivion.
If the plan went through, that B-52 would have been shot down after it released the missile. The crew, actually worked like a suicide bomber. They only deliver something to the order. They never know they were the sacrifice. The news of the "accident" of B-52, would have sink into the ocean of nuclear panic too. That's why the bomb is not regular nuclear bomb. They were advanced cruise missiles armed with nuclear heads. All targets were pre-settled. They shoot automatically by the remote control command. At that time, I believe the TV would broadcast another tape from Bin Laden to claim a victory of Jihad. And Russian would admit they lost six nuclear bombs in their warehouse.
511. Seven most wanted cities by Feds (9/28/07)
In October plot last year, seven cities were targets.
On 10/9/06, North Korea had a nuclear test. (Manipulate N.Korea through China to push for a nuclear panic and justify the source of nuclear material used in dirty bomb.)
On 10/11, Lidle's small plane crashed to a sky-rise in New York. (To justify the terror attack method, that small plane's action is out of control.)
On 10/12, a warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".
Homeland Security Department said the threat was being viewed "with strong skepticism". The FBI also expressed doubt about the threat.
However in August plot this year, there is a strange coincidence that a news said Al Qaida targets at seven US cities. This time there was no doubt expressed.
Re: Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear
Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
NewsMax Wires
Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida.
Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously
http://w3.newsmax.com/a/dayofislam/?PROMO_CODE=34BE-1
Obviously Feds has 7 US cities as their most wanted. Then why there were only six nuclear missiles prepared in this operation? Because a B-52 can only hang 6 missiles in each of its wing. One wing must hang un-nuclear missiles to justify a security check has been done. So six was their utmost.
Re: "How warheads made an unplanned flight
By Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post
September 23, 2007
WASHINGTON -- --
The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane's wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs."
Which are the most wanted cities of Feds? Two in October plot 2006 were Oakland and Houston. One of my sister (I think she is a murder target of the Feds) lives in Oakland. In August 2007 plot, Feds prepared a shut down of Bay Bridge (which connects Oakland and San Francisco). I think they planned a tunnel bombing for my sister so Oakland could exempt from a nuclear attack last month. Houston is a city one of my cousin lives. (Is my cousin a target too?) I'm sure it's a target because in Katrina case, Houston was the predicted landing spot of Hurricane Rita. And the Hurricane landing day was September 24, the action day of the plot.
The other two cities would be Washington DC and Boston, I think. The White House was said one target of the four planes in 9/11/2001. Only that plane crashed in mid-way. But to justify a war on Iran, to destroy Capital is a necessity. Boston has been in hit list in several terror case. In 1/20/2005, there was a Boston dirty bomb case. In late January 2007, there was an ad scare case in Boston. The ad box which could turn into bombing box appeared in 10 US cities. All planned by Feds, I allege.
Do you live in one of these cities?