536. Feds and Obama (2/3/08)
It seems Feds has a deal with Obama and chooses him as the most favorite of Demo candidate.
1. Mercury News - a tool of Feds - recommends: Barack Obama as Demo candidate and John McCain as GOP candidate. That's not a decision based on opinion or policy but on Feds' intention. John McCain is famous for his "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.". If Mercury News is anti-war, then it should have picked up Ron Paul. But it chooses a warmonger. Then why it picks up Obama in Demo instead of Clinton?
2. From Republican's platform, Obama is easier to be defeat than Clinton. So they would rather have Obama as their rival. Or in another word, it will be more reasonable to defeat Obama in a rigged election. Obama may represent mainstream public opinion. So what. Ron Paul has a more distinctive flag, hasn't Feds successfully put him at the bottom? With same tactic they can easily defeat Obama. Justify it as Americans are not ready for a black president.
3. Even if Obama wins. He is easier to be manipulated than Hillary. Hillary, backed by a huge Demo party machine, has to take care of the interest of the Demo Party more or less. Obama is a new berry. He has not that burden. He will satisfy Feds demand more than to his party.
4. Bush is awarded by two terms of US President because he loyally carries out the policy of Feds. DOJ got Patriot Act and warrantless eavesdropping, DOD got fat budget and war. Feds got their own representative as their head: Ashcroft, Gonzalez, Mukasy. This time, when they failed to get Edwards as Demo president candidate, they have him as their future head - Attorney General.
Quote, "Attorney General Edwards?
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration.
http://www.creators.com/opinion/robe...l-edwards.html
537. Missile murder attempt under the cover of meteorite (2/8/08)
To coordinate the election, to improve the image of Republican Party, the news about war on terror significantly reduced recently. Feds tried not to relate GOP to notorious Bush's "achievement". US casualty in Iraq drops to a new low. Al Qaida and militants take a vacation . Terror attack warning is less heard - which was once so prosperous in mid 2007. Do you still remember the gut feeling of Chertoff, Mueller and other "terror" experts who warned feverishly in July 07? Media tries its best to avoid the issue of "Iraq war", "war on terror", "warrantless wiretap". To reduce the criticism on Bush to the least.
The terror attack, mostly are manipulated by Feds, I think. They try to make it a big one to distract the framed case on me. The case is so big that in 18 months Feds had closed (or tried to close) the Bay Bridge for 5 times. The recent silence on "terror attack" news doesn't mean the persecution is postponed. It goes on, in another way - in a form of natural disaster. In early February, I found such a topic in a web-site. "50/50 chance we die on January 24"
Quote, "Asteroid 2007 TU24
A meteor the size of a sky scraper is coming dangerously close to earth. On January 24 4PM the meteor will hit.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread328087/pg1
Then I remembered another news in that month:
"Spy satellite on collision course
By Eillen Sullivan A.P.
Washington - A large US spy satellite has lost power and could hit the Earth in late February or early March. ..... The satellite can no longer can be controlled, and it is unknown where on the planet it might come down." (Mercury News 1/27/08)
My interpret to these two news is that Feds planed a murder case in the cover of natural disaster - a meteorite explode in January 24. When that plan went soured they immediately (3 days later) prepared another one - by announcing a lost control spy satellite which will hit Earth in late February.
Why the plan of January 24 failed? I think "Asteroid 2007 TU24" was a rock not a missile. Though they could expect the time the rock entering the atmosphere of the Earth, they couldn't control its track to a designated area. How to throw an object on to a targeted area (that is San Francisco Bay Area) from space? By a controlled satellite. Of course the mastermind is Feds, so easy for them to find an old spy satellite as sacrifice. They moved it to the track they wanted. (It was easy for them to announce the satellite is out of control) To make it look like real, it takes weeks for the satellite to descend to the atmosphere. But the satellite is not a missile, how do you know it will direct hit the designated area?
Don't worry. The real work will be done by missiles. (Theoretically, the debris possibly scattered in a range thousands miles long.) Nobody can tell the damage is done by a missile or by a satellite. Because the investigator is the murderer. It will be similar to 911. A self demolishing (in this case, a missile attack) under the cover of the collapse caused by plane impact.( in this case, a satellite's impact)
To prevent the revelation of the truth, the article ("Spy satellite on collision course") also warned "The spacecraft contains hydrazine - which is rocket fuel - according to a government official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Hydrazine, a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor, is a toxic chemical and can cause harm to anyone who is in contact with it." They don't allow outsiders have any chance to investigate it. But by common sense, any fuel will be burned off when the satellite enters atmosphere. It won't survive the high temperature caused by friction.
As for a missile attack disguised as meteorite, I have talked about this tactic two years ago in " 356. Tsunami, flooding and meteorite (11/7/05)" I said,
Quote, "Unknown object falls on Indonesia
Meteor or bomb? Officials not sure, no injuries known
Jakarta, Indonesia (AP)
Indonesia air force radar detected an unidentified object falling toward the Earth at a great speed before disappearing at around the same time as the noise was heard.
Police have been on high alert in Indonesia in recent days after several Western governments reported that Islamic militants, blamed for a series of attacks in recent years, were planning more bombings."
(Mercury News, 12/19/04)
I believe it was an experiment of space weapon. A practice of a missile cruised in space to hit the target on earth. But a missile is not a meteor. Everything would be clear if there was an investigation. That's why the news drew a tail, to hint it might be a terrorist bombing.
It's not a coincidence that both events which Anthony Carr prophesied (tsunami and meteor) took place in Indonesia, almost at same time. (12/19/04 for meteor, one week later, on 12/26, for tsunami)
Because two months ago, in October that year, Yudhoyono became the President of Indonesia. Inside group then had a safe place to carry out their experiment for new technology under the protection of a puppet dictator.