549. Plant "drug shoes"? (5/27/08)
On 5/11, my relatives came to my home. They picked me up for a shopping ride. After I finished the food shopping, we went to KOHL Store. I want to buy a pair of shoes.
While I walked around to watch and test shoes, my brother suddenly urged me to go home. He said others were waiting us to go for the dinner. He said he had extra shoes to give me to save my money. So we went home. That night he gave me three pairs of shoes. The size fits my foot.
They were all used ones. Some even worn out with holes. I washed them thoroughly days later.
Then I noticed something unusual in surveillance team in my area. There are new faces to replace the old ones and they are aggressive. I wonder if they frame a new case of "drug shoes"? I thought of "shoe bomber" story. That was an authority's frame case full of flaw 6 years ago. The work was much more of a 007 story done by laboratory of intelligence because it needed special explosives and fine work than to be done by a homeless with mental problem.(see PROBLEMS SURFACE WITH SHOE BOMBER STORY
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shoedoubts.html) So will this time Feds create a case of drug shoes? Consider Feds almost exhaust all their resource to frame a case against me, it's quite possible. (only for the purpose to close the traffic of Bay Bridge, last year they plotted 1. Burning down a main Bridge exit Highway 580 by an oil tanker on 4/29/07 2. Collapsed Minneapolis Bridge to justify the close up of Bay Bridge in 8/30-9/1/07. In the name that Bridge needed a repair. 3. Tried to collapse Bay Bridge by hitting Bridge's supporter with a boat Cosco Busan. on 11/7/07.) There is no difference between planting drug shoes and planting drug money. Although it doesn't make sense to deliver drug in empty shoe heels. After all, there is no Custom to watch, why made such a dramatic operation?
I don't think my brother touches drugs. And I washed these shoes thoroughly. How can Feds make a drug shoe case? Only by planting. After I washed the shoes, my wife took out a box, asked me if I want to store them. She used to put extra shoes in garage. The garage is separated from the house and easy to access. That's an ideal place for planting. Her suggestion reminds me of the frame case. I refused. I am home all day long, surfing the internet. How can Feds intrude my house to plant drug shoe? The only chance is when I go out to shopping food on week ends. Then I did a test. Last week end, I stay at home. For consecutive three days, (last week end was memorial day long week end) my wife went out every day and ate outside. I think my speculation is correct. Because my wife used to be home on week ends, cooking food. especially these days when gas price is so high. I think Feds arranged her absence. It gave Feds a chance to intrude the house to plant if I went out shopping.
This is why I view the Fourth Amendment so important and warrantless surveillance so evil. It gives corrupt Feds chance to plant and frame innocent people.
550. Cyclone in Burma (6/2/08)
A cyclone attacked Burma on May 3, 08. I looked at the path of the cyclone. It went along the coast of South Burma, then finished in Thailand. I think it was created by Pentagon. A climate modification needs spreading of chemical, how could Pentagon operate it in Burma - an unfriendly country? The cyclone path told everything. It was easy to create a cyclone in ocean area, then push it on to a designated path by creating an target area of low air pressure - in this case it was Thailand. Thailand is an ally of US. Its military collaborated with Pentagon actively in Vietnam war. So it was easy to produce a low air pressure space over there. And the south coast of Burma is the nearest area to the international air. Where planes could spread chemical to modify the moving of the cyclone.
About three years ago I have said hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita were artificial weather system created by Feds in frame case against me. Though Feds activated its accessories to repudiate the weather modification technique, more and more information prove the weather control skill. Here is one:
Quote, "Navy Research Paper: 'Disrupt Economies' with Man-Made 'Floods,' 'Droughts' |
February 11, 2008
By Noah Shachtman
Hurricane_andrew A recently-unearthed U.S. Navy research project calls for creating mad-made floods and droughts to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state.
"Weather modification was used successfully in Viet Nam to (among other things) hinder and impede the movement of personnel and material from North Viet Nam to South Viet Nam," notes a Naval Air Warfare Weapons Division - China Lake research proposal, released last month through the Freedom of Information Act. But "since that time military research on Weather Modification has dwindled in the United States."
The proposal suggests a study of the latest weather manipulation techniques, to "give the U.S. military a viable, state-of-the-art weather modification capability again." With that in hand, American forces would be able...
To impede or deny the movement of personnel and material because of rains-floods, snow-blizzards, etc.
(2) To disrupt economy due to the effect of floods, droughts, etc.
.......
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/0...esearch-p.html
There is no doubt US has ability to manipulate the weather. But is it just to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state this time? No, there is other purpose. One thing unusual this time is media aggressively reported Burmese disaster, accusing Burma government for rejecting international aid, or allowing limited help, or controlling aid. Someone even suggests to invade Burma to punish its negligence of people. Will it develop to another Iraq style invasion? A wolf always finds reason to eat a lamb. But it's ridiculous to invade with such a reason. Should US be invaded for its negligence in Katrina disaster?
Burma was once famous for its opium trading business. To invade Burma, or put a pressure on it, is it more appropriate to invade Burma by accusation of drug smuggling than by accusation of negligence of a natural disaster? But US doesn't mention a word on drug smuggling. Why?
It is a case to push Burma regime to revive drug trading, I allege. (to be continued)