America the start of WWIII

[Vaeal]

Sparta, Rome, Nazi Germany. All three of these countries/cities were the most elite of their time. Centered on might, all three set on a quest to make the world into their vision. Today, i tell you, Their is a fourth.
America has crossed the line yesterday. She sent missles to attack a country whom commited no act of war, nor was at war. She ignored the United Nations, much like Japan did 50 years ago. And now she is slowly taking control of the world. Not by occupation, thats not where control flows. But by trade, military, and reputation.
America has no need to be concerned about iraq, Iraq commited no act of war. 9/11, for those of you who dont know, was not commited by iraq. A small part of the funds MAY have come from iraq, however, Much more, enormously large, funds came from america herself. Through drugs, cars, and freelance organizations, america contributed the majority of foreign contributions (not the govenment per say, but the citizens in it).
America is not even a big threat by iraq. Saddam may dislike america, but their are other countries, not surrounded by the worlds biggest ocean, that neighbor his country that are mostly threatened. Whether countries like israel or iraq, or people like the kurds, Saddam has better fish to fry than america.
And speaking of threats by weapons of mass destruction. If i ran a country other than iraq or america, i would not fear iraq at all. Iraq may develope a nuclear weapon. okay, my attention now may be a little shifted to iraq to see whats up. But unless im told they have one and are launching one at my, my attention will not be shifted from americas 27,000 NUCLEAR WARHEADS. And that information was declassified 10 years ago. who knows how many we have right now, or how powerful. Their is a little story that i feel fits right in here, the setting is nazi germany. "first they went after the jews, and i did not stand up. then they went after they gypsies, still, i did not stand up. then they went after the gays, i did not stand up. Then they went after the poles, and i did not stand up. Finally, they came after me, and their was noone left to stand up." This is a prime example of what is going on right now. America went after the al-qaeda. Noone stood up. Now their going after Iraq. Few are standing up, not enough to make a difference. What happens next? What happens when they take all of the middle east? Then europe, then the world? I hope america has no desire for world control, but if she is attacking a country whom no act of war was made, who knows?
And dont let american propaganda fool you. America isnt after terrorism. That is her weapon, to terrorize. Dont believe me? Look at japan. Hiroshima, Nagasaki. Both where attacks made on CIVILIAN TARGETS, against the haque convention, and both where made with the sole intent of terrorizing japan to the extent that they would surender.
America's power is unchecked, noone can confront her. the U.N. tried, but didnt succed. That, i fear, is the last of the worlds efforts to stop the bloodthirsty america. This is the the only way i can warn the world, please, open you eyes and look at america. With enough people, and a righeous cause, any evil can be overcome. America could be stopped before we get to the point where World War IV will be fought with STICKS AND STONES! She will kill many to prevent the slightest possibilty of losing little. SUch has been shown in the past, such will be shown in the future. She defies her own principle, and she will defy you if you allow her to. Now is the time to Fight. Fight while she is not undefitable. God help us all if no one realizes how much she craves power.
"Only the dead have seen the end to war"

[Rikbe]

Beating up a terrorist country is not a world war. For this a serious opponent is needed, like China or a coalition of Arab countries, but these are too busy competing which each other to start a war.

[Vaeal]

I dont think america is starting world war 3 now, im sorry if you misunderstood. I am saying america is on a path for control and if noone stands up to say america is going too far, she will eventually try to get control of a country whom will resist to the poing where war breaks out, for example france, germany, spain. Now their is no/little reasoninf for them to be attacked now, physically or politically, however, the future is unkown and things happen, its always best to be prepared.

[Gravity]

It's not a world war.
It's not a war against terrorism.
It's called a war for oil and domination.

[Rikbe]

Originally posted by namnam
It's not a world war.
It's not a war against terrorism.
It's called a war for oil and domination.

Naturally it is about domination. Better an American economic domination than an Islamic ideologic tyranny.

[Gravity]

Originally posted by Rikbe

Naturally it is about domination. Better an American economic domination than an Islamic ideologic tyranny.

An Islamic ideologic tyranny? Haha! Where did you get that from? Do you call Hussein an islamist? Oh man, give me a break...
Call it a tyranny, but don't add Islamic, because it has NOTHING to do with islamism.
The key figures in Iraq’s regime and ruling party are non-religious and even non-believers. Saddam himself is not a devout Muslim. Yes, when it suits him, he portrays himself as a Muslim leader, so call him an opportunist, but NOT an islamist.
Do you call the long oppression of the country's Shi'a Muslim majority the Islamic ideology? Is that Baath party with secular origins and social ideology that you call Islamic?..
So when you speak about Islamic ideology be sure that you know what it means.


The U.S. has a huge appetite - to rule over the whole world. I hate this dominance. I hate that the U.S. tells the world what's right and what's wrong. I do hope that one day the U.S. will choke over her 'food'.

[Edited by namnam on 22nd March 2003 at 10:01]

[Rikbe]

Originally posted by namnam


An Islamic ideologic tyranny? Haha! Where did you get that from? Do you call Hussein an islamist? Oh man, give me a break...
Call it a tyranny, but don't add Islamic, because it has NOTHING to do with islamism.
The key figures in Iraq’s regime and ruling party are non-religious and even non-believers. Saddam himself is not a devout Muslim. Yes, when it suits him, he portrays himself as a Muslim leader, so call him an opportunist, but NOT an islamist.
Do you call the long oppression of the country's Shi'a Muslim majority the Islamic ideology? Is that Baath party with secular origins and social ideology that you call Islamic?..
So when you speak about Islamic ideology be sure that you know what it means.


The U.S. has a huge appetite - to rule over the whole world. I hate this dominance. I hate that the U.S. tells the world what's right and what's wrong. I do hope that one day the U.S. will choke over her 'food'.

[Edited by namnam on 22nd March 2003 at 10:01]

I am not talking about Saddam, I am talking about the USA and it's war against terrorism (mainly Muslim). Iraq and Afghanistan is only the beginning.
Islam tries to take over the world, USA are the only to do something about this.

[duffman]

i hope when you guys are refering to americans you are refering to the government and not the people controlled by the dictatorship we call america... bush and all the pukes in washington have made it seem as if we have rights and can vote whoever we want in and out of office but this is not true... and is a common misconception between americans because most do not know this and will support an american cause without question because that is what we have been brainwashed into doing.....

[Carl_Long]

Yow. The tinfoil hat brigade is out in force.

World domination! Brainwashing! Nuclear armageddon!

What do you guys do for a living? Sell bomb-shelters?

sheesh...