The dark side of USA

[kathaksung]

32. "Operation Fire Dragon"

My wife worked in a travel company in 1987. She was an accountant. Everything was quite well until 1991 when drug case happened. Then the boss became picky. At last she changed my wife's work, from an accountant to a ticket agent.

I noticed that three of four of her colleagues left the company. Among new comers, there was a lady, I called her G-lady because she guided my wife changed her job twice from two companies.

In 1994, I left for China. About that time, G-lady changed her job into another company- A and S Tours Inc.. She introduced my wife to work in that company. The boss, Mrs H, was a lady from Taiwan, she was under surveillance by Federal law enforcement agency because her brother H was an arms agent, and had a weapon deal at that time. Of course, none of us knew this until the case broke. The case was given a name "Operation Fire dragon" by BATF. H bought some rifles (AK-47, I think) from China and sold them to someone in South America. He was charged that he had shipment of assault weapon without permit. H said he did not know he need a permit because the destination was South America. US was just a transferring point.
What I knew My wife's new boss was charged for receiving a gun box. It was said an agent had guaranteed it was legal , and final verdict of 'innocent' proved he was right because 'gun box' itself was not a weapon. But it didn't stop them to prosecute her though they knew it's innocent.

I reviewed the whole case after it was closed. I have new recognition of Federal law enforcement agency. They tried to circle as many people as possible in a case. Because more people involved, more chance to be benefited. Mrs. H was charged for a gun box which was not a weapon. I think she was charged because she was rich, she had real estate property in San Francisco and San Mateo County, a possible 'profit' source. After I went to China, Mrs. Chen's case was closed. But my family was still under surveillance. Through guiding my wife to a company involved in a case, they still could monitor us legally. G-lady quitted from
the A & S Tours Inc. about one month before the case broke. She avoided to be involved in any trouble. I didn't believe any coincidence already then. I even think 'operation Fire Dragon' probably was masterminded by Federal Law enforcement agency.(It was easy, only by disguising a buyer from South America, a tactic they frequently use,they could easily build a case.) When my wife went to the new company, the weapon's deal should only be in process, maybe just started, but they foresaw there would be a case and guided her in.

[clodhopper]

how much do you get paid to put out this propaganda?

[kathaksung]

Originally posted by clodhopper
how much do you get paid to put out this propaganda?

Good question. What I got paid: unemployed, driver license expired, all credit card cancelled.

[kathaksung]

33. Evaluation of property

About in 1992, a former colleague of my wife when she was in Hong Kong came to visit US with her husband. At that time, friends and relatives were intimidated by law enforcement agents and kept a distance from us. So I thought it was a little strange, especially they chose to stay at our house for two nights. Tourist used to stay in San Francisco, rarely came to San Jose.

The husband started to talk about stamp collection. I collected stamp when I was a child and kept that hobby until then. Even in the years of Chinese Cultural revolution, I didn't give up. At that extraordinary period, collect stamp was regarded as a capitalist hobby, stamp store were shut down, stamps were burned. I almost have most stamps government issued since 1949. Now it worths something, especially those issued during Culture Revolution and before that period, because most of them were abandoned and destroyed. He asked me to show him my collection and viewed them carefully. He astonished me by offering 1700(HK dollars) for a set of stamp which face value is only 2 (HK dollars). That price could cover almost total cost I spent on my collection. Then he talked about how he collected stamps. He bought bunch of sheets of stamp when new edition issued and put them in safe box. So when value increased, he made a lot of money. He talked about this again and again.

I thought, this way was not a hobby, it was investment. Rich men's business. He was rich, he had a securities company. He came to estimate the value of my collection and encourage me to have more by offering a high price on one set of stamp. Collection, as well as gold, cash, jewel are Federal law enforcement's favorites. Because these things are usually with no record and easy be stolen. Even my wife doesn't know how many and what kind of stamp I have. And the husband might think he worked for Law enforcement agency so he was trusted by government. He didn't know it was not coincidence. They picked him up because he was rich. Just like the burglary to my youngest brother in law, (he is the richest among my sisters and brother), the prosecution of the boss of A and S Tours, (though they knew she was innocent), he was chosen because he was a possible 'profit' source. Of course, I knew nothing of this, only felt it was unusual then. I recognize all this bit and bit by accumulation of experience later.

34. The lost Credit Card

I had a Visa card. About in September 1993, Visa card company said they would transfer my Visa card into GM Mastercard. I wonder why they did so and thought they might sold business to another company.

In Oct. 15, Visa card company gave me a letter, said that as one of select customers, they were sending me a Mastercard to replace Visa card. Usually this was a notice and customers would receive the card in a week or so. I didn't pay much attention on this because at that time, I felt pressure on my business. Newspaper said Mrs. Chen's drug case would be sentenced next week. Berryessa Flea Market announced there would be a Festival next week. There would be music, and free beer. I've been in Berryessa for nearly 10 years. It was the first time experience. Free beer reminded me of free entertainment of Disneyland for FBI agent. It seemed that they would close the drug case and had a celebration. I knew I was much more a target than any real criminals because I knew too much dark side of Federal law enforcement agency. I didn't know what they would do but expected there would be a violent end. So I abandoned my business that week.

In Nov. 24, GM Card co. mailed me a letter, reminding me they had sent me the card, and emphasized with bold letter that:" If you have not received your new card(s), please call our Lost/Stolen Dept. at......." The same sentence was put in an eye-catching box at the top of the letter. I called that number. Staff said they would cancel the lost card and mail me new one. Right next day, I received the letter contained new Mastercard. "What an efficiency!" I admired while calling Card company to confirm of receipt. To my surprise, I was interrogated by the staff for sometime. Then they told me the card number I confirmed was reported lost yesterday and should be the card due in my hands one month ago. I immediately realized someone surveying on my mail had held the credit card. They only released it when touched off by report lost phone call. That's why I got the lost mail next day to the phone call. The promised new card arrived nine days later.

Since then I was aware they even developed a system to steal from people. Everything was well planed in advance, they even could get a credit card of full amount from victim which the dead man could never verify. It may also explain why they are so easily kill innocent people: they can always 'profit' from it, either by credit card, cash or their collections. And it is the safest loot, no one will complain. All victims are dead people.

35. A blackmail on 911 WTC bombing

On Sept.24, 2001, my wife received a letter from her credit card company. (I have cancelled all my credit cards long time ago when I knew their dirty methods) With big letters it asks "May we send you a new card?" and suggests to send a new Platinum Visa Business card with a credit line of up to $35,000. My wife does not have a business. And the amount she charged credit card is about 500 each month. In another word, the total amount she charged each year on credit card is only about a tail figure of that offer of each month. I don't know what information the credit card company based on. With my own experience, I knew it's unusual. Since I revealed the dark side of Federal law enforcement agency, I have a feeling they will eliminate those who know my story.

In same day, Attorney General John Ashcroft made an urgent plea to obtain greater police powers to combat terrorism. One proposal is to allow wiretap information obtained by foreign governments to be used in court by federal prosecutors even if it was gathered in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Federal law enforcement agency already have unbridle powers. With new proposal they almost can do whatever they want to hurt the people they don't like. Something Federal law enforcement agent can't do or unwilled to do, can then be done by the hands of foreign government. Then they can frame many case by unreliable source. We know many foreign countries are under influence of US government like CIA. The harassment I suffered in South East Asia proved FBI, DEA's extend power through inter-police. Now by the chance of 911 terrorist bombing, they try to grip more power. I think a plot planed by Federal law enforcement agent involved with Chinese government is now in developing.

[clodhopper]

I would reccomend they be awarded the Legion of merit.

[kathaksung]

36. Frame a case

At the same time, I found my thread "Why DEA,FBI involved in secret deal of spy plane" was censored in 'Above top secret.com', and was moved away in 'Newsmax.com'.
In the thread, I alleged DEA,FBI were framing a drug case with Chinese secret police. It seems they are uneasy with my thread and try to block people from knowing it. I fear it's a symptom they are carrying out a frame case.

They are demanding more power now. Ashcroft and President Bush are pressing Congress to rush through a new pakage of law which give them broader power to detain people, electronic surveillance and evidence using in court which gathered in violation of Fouth Amendment of US Constitution. Pushing for a swift passage, Ashcroft using the word "a clear, present danger" of terrorist attack to intimidate. Later law enforcement officer explained that's because of his "relative inexperience". They even put a label of 'Patriot Act' on it. Then those who oppose it for the threatenning of civil liberty will become 'unpatriot'.

And it's the best time now to do it. Since it's a frame case, there will be a slaughter to seal the mouths of people if they would have been in custody. They need a big event to transfer public's attention. And the coming Afghanistan war will be a good one.

See "Why DEA,FBI involved in secret deal of spy plane" at:

http://www.newsmax.com/ubb/Forum10/HTML/000955.html

37. Manipulate Bank operation

Congress, under tremendous pressure, hastily passed the "Patriot Act" on Oct. 12. Democratic members of Congress were given little time to review the content and were given only one hour to debate although it is the most important Act about civil rights in recent decades. It once again proves Federal law enforcement agency has unchecked power that they can push through Act swiftly which favours to them. It will surely lead to conditions under which petty criminals as well as innocent people, get labled and punished as terrorists. And potential of abuse is predictable.

I'm afraid they will use new griped power to deal with people they hate. So I broke sequence to talk about how I seeking asylum in Thailand.

In February, 2000, I was in Cambodia. Where I was alarmed by it's telephone rate, 4 dollars per minute to US.(When I managed to live at a level of 10 dollars per day), And I learnt from book that the next three nations I was going, Vietnam; Laos; Burma were all notorious for their high rates and inconvenience on tele-communication. So I went back to Thailand where telephone rate was comparatively low. I called my wife to remit me some money. She told me that San Jose bank said I had to have a bank account to receive money. I visited several big banks in Bangkok and found it was almost impossible for foreign tourist to open an account. (A minimum ballance of 5,000 to start. If I had that much money, I wouldn't need remittace) They all assured me that it was common practice that tourists can get remittance by passport with appropriet name and passport number. They told me they had many remittance from US in this way. And surprisely asked:" Which part of US you live?" I thought these banks explanation were reasonable. I thought Federal law enforcement agency might abuse their power to block me to get the remittance in normal way. I wrote a letter to Mr. Ralph Horton, legal attache of US Consulate in Bangkok, request an investigation. There was no response.

Re: Letter to Mr. Ralph Horton
"March 7, 2000

Mr. Ralph Horton
Legal Attache
95 Wireless Rd.
Bangkok 10330


I am writing you to ask for help to solve remittance problem. I was a retailer in flea maket. In 1991, one of my merchandise supplier was arrested for heroin smuggling. I found I was under 24 hours surveillance by law enforcement since then. Things became worse after I found they use radiation material as tracer which hurt my health badly. As pressure intensified, I was forced to go abroad because I felt my life was threatened. I went Southeast Asia. even in these countries, I am still survied by the police of these countries.

Om February. 2000, I asked my wife to send me $3,000.00 She told me that the banks in San Jose would not wire money unless there is an account in Bangkok. But banks in Bangkok make it impossible for foreigner tourist to open an account. It is common practice that tourist can get remittence by passport with appropriet name and passport number. The staffs of bank are surprise at account need theory and asked "(this rule) is from which part of United States?"

Someone has abused their power to blocked me to get money in normal way. I request you to investigate in this event and a quick response would be appriciated.

Sincerely

Kat Hak Sung

p.s. My permanent mailing address is: *********
San Jose, Ca.95132
U.S.A.
tel408)***-****

My wife's name: ******* Sung"

[kathaksung]

Anthrax crisis

1. Several weeks ago, I went to internet, found all windows of web-sites were error message pages. Thus I was blocked away from reading and posting. To verify if it was a virus attack of 'code red', I went to my tenant's computer, he had a diffrent phone line. All web-sites were normal there. I was under surveillance by agents for a long time. It was an obvious proof that they harassed my computer on my phone line. Now in "Patriot Act", there is broder power authorize agents to survey multiple lines instead of one, which means it's now legal for them block someone from communication to out world if only agents think he is a suspect. In previous event, I could have been blocked from getting information or asking for help if I found they abuse their power.

2. Anthrax crisis. Who has the resource and motive to do it?

I don't think it's Bin Ladden's work. Their terrorist operation were well planed and prepared. And resulted with large influence. If they use biotech weapon, most likely will be in public spot such like public square, railway station.... . Casulties will be large.

Now the anthrax threats seemed to be a purposed one. The only case of death attracts public's attention, (do you think terrorist will give you a signal to warn that they will bomb somewhere like TWC with hijacked planes?) then with the help of media , raise a wave of horror to push through "Patriot Act" to grip more power. And let people agree with them to abuse these power.

The next targets were chief of NBC and Senator Daschle. (For terrorist targets, President Bush, Defense Secretary Rumsfield are more likely) The purpose is obviously to intimidate Media and Legislature, which could have been a check power if there would be a frame case.

And I allege they'll also eliminate people they don't like by this chance. I have four sisters and brother, two of them and two of in-laws are working in post office. I always worry about thier safety because they know my story. Especially when the news reported "No-glove rule worries some San Jose postal workers - Officials say safety policy prohibits machine operators from wearing latex gloves, despite fears of potential anthrax exposures" which makes an anthrax killing resonable. ( Consider Federal law enforcement agent used to do pre-propaganda to cover their murder plot. Such like to owe a Fluorescent lamp killing to Solar storm; microwave killing to heart attack; microwave ray shooting killing to memingitis, cellule phone...etc.)

Least casulty to raise public's scare. Intimidation on media and legislature to create a surrounding to grip and abuse power without interference. A case created much more likely by Federal law enforcement agent than terrorist. That's my point of view. Hope there will be no more development for cover up after my comment. (Such like killing more people, expanding mailing range, the cover up work they used to do.This comment first posted on Oct. 21, 01)

[clodhopper]

next time you see Ben Laden check his pulse.

[kathaksung]

Anthrax crisis, who has motive and resource(2)

1. The first victim, Bob Stevens, died on Oct. 5. He was an photo editor of Sun, a tabloid focus on scandals of celebrities such like Princess Diana's affair, Clinton and Lewinsky affair or President's drunken daughters. It seems he was much more a revenge target of some powerful celebrities then OBL and his Al -Qaida. Do you think terrorist know Bob and choose him the first target?

2. The following event was a purposed intimidation on media and Senator, to develop an atmospere of horror which would favour Federal law enforcement agency to grip more power.

3. After 15 days observation, I reached conclusion of " Least casulty to raise public's scare." and put it on internet on Oct. 21. I had worried if they would do some cover up so I wrote at the end of message:"Hope there will be no more development for cover up after my comment. (Such like killing more people, expanding mailing range, the cover up work they used to do.This comment first posted on Oct. 21, 01) " Because I am too familiar with their behavior. (You can see they quickly released held credit card after report lost phone call (#34. The lost credit card), and they changed their parking behavior right away after I found their working shift. (#28. My wife intimidated)

4. The response is swift. On Oct. 23, news paper said there were two more deaths related to anthrax. One death on Oct. 21, and one on Oct.22. (to break "least casulty"allegation) and discovery of anthrax spore in Pentagon and supreme court. (to break "media and legislature only" allegation) and to my worry of "no gloves rule" A news said, "Promted in part by complaints from letter carriers in Sunnyvale and several west coast cities, postal authorities Tuesday(Oct.23) reassured in light of the anthrax scare they now have a right to wear gloves and mask...."(San Jose Mercury, Oct 24) In several days, all my allegations were covered, but my expectation was proved too though I had wished not. I don't think all these were coincidence.

[kathaksung]

Anthrax crisis, who has motive and resource (3)

Newspaper said 911 terrorist leader Atta made contact with an Iraq diplomat this spring in Czech. And the material found mixed in anthrax letter are used by three countries: US; Russia; Iraq. Iraq thus becomes a main suspect. This meets some government officials' demand. They need an excuse to extend war against countries which sponser terrorist. And Iraq is the most wanted.

If Iraq is behind this anthrax attack, then it's a 'friendly attack' because 1. The first victim is a US celebrities' dislike. 2. Through that death, it gave US a pre-warning that there would be an anthrax attack. 3. It's a 'mercy attack'. Casualty is light and victims are ordinary people. 4. It maintains an intension on media and legislation so that they'll support adminstration's draged Afghanistan war.

But it's more like a little qroup's operation than a state sponsered biological warfare. The qroup took the chance of 911 terrorist bombing to test a new murder method by first mailing some brown granular material to NBC news on Sept. 18, then mailing letter with refined white powder to Senator Daschle on Oct. 8. They are testing the result of anthrax which were took from different sources step by step. And the fourth anthrax fatality, Nguyen, died mysteriously. She had no access to comtamination of bacteria. Her death won't cause any serious attention or trouble. She was a single, old minority, a perfect victim for a biology weapon test. Since anthrax is a restricted material, who has the authority and motive and resources to do that attack?

[kathaksung]

Anthrax crisis rose fast, faded fast. I review the whole case, get such conclusion.

1. The letter containing brown granular material to NBC News dated Sept. 18, Seven days after 911 WTC bombing. And all letters were mailed in N.J. Obviously taking the chance to owe it a terrorist attack.

2. The letter to Senator Daschle dated Oct. 8, at a time the government officials announced to extend war to "countries hosting terrorist" while Iraq is their most wanted. In that letter, a refined white powder was found mixed with a clay called bentonite which is said only three countries used with. They are: US, Russia and Iraq. At the same time, a news said terrorist leader Atta had contacted Irag diplomat in Czech this spring. An information obviously let out by intelligence. All these made to fit government's demand: Iraq was a big suspect.

3. The first victim Bob Stevens was a photo editor of a tabloid, much more a revenge target of powerful US celebrities than terrorist.

4. One thing touched my mind was Dan Rathor's angry face in TV when his assistant Fletch was tested positive in skin anthrax and his office was found contaminated. I have posted in a web site "CBS evening news". Host was Dan Rathor. The forum title was "My America dream". I had posted about ten messages there then found it was closed before I was going to put some more. My thread "My America nightmare" became the last one of that web site. I thus think Dan Rathor might know some of my story, or in another word, the dark side of Federal law enforcement agency. Because he is a media man, he becomes a target? Or is this just an intimidation?

5. Though Federal law enforcement agency hold big power, they still have a little check and balance in legislation such like they need legislation's approve for their "Patriot Act". When Rep. Gary Condit's case happened, I had a feeling it's almost the second edition of Clinton and Lewinsky scandal. All these need intelligence operation behind curtain. Affairs revealed, politicians told a lie try to cover the scandal, then evidence appeared to discridit them. At first, I didn't know why Condit was chosen. I got it when I saw the news said he is a member of 'intelligence committee'. A committee which oversees Federal law enforcement agency. That's the way they played once and again in peace time. Now it's war. From my angle, anthrax attack is another kind of extortion, or intimidation.

6. Ashcroft proposed "Patriot Act" on Sept. 24. It was passed on Oct.24. The anthrax letter targeted media and legislation, put a pressure on them, created a situation favoured law enforcement agency to grip more power, and pushed public to support government's 'war' policy.

7. The powder found in letter to Daschle is weapons grade. Yet none staffs in the room suffered casulty when the letter was opened and powder was spewing into the air. But casulties were considerable in postal workers even though the letters were sealed well with four sides taped.

8. Who has the ability to get different anthrax products. (It should be a restrict material) Especially the white powder is weapon grade. Even in US, I think maybe there is only one or two secret lab carry it.

9. I posted my doubt on Oct. 21. Said it was a "least casulty to raise public scare". Then there were three deaths occured (Oct. 21,22,31) I alleged it was a cover up. And all three were minorities, two blacks and a Vietnamese. In my experience, scapegoat used to be minority, mostly black people. Hope this won't cause another cover up operation. (first put into internet on Nov. 13)

Intimidation

Anthrax was first said could be gotten from 30 to 40 places in US which are produced for medical purpose. But the one used in letter to Senator is weapon grade, which means maybe only one secret lab involved. Perhaps that's why investigators early said the highly refined strain of anthrax bacteria could only have been produced by labs in US, Russia and Iraq, but now believe it could "be from anywhere". And also, it could be done in "any lab with equipment worth as little as $2500." But that raises one question: if it's that easy to access, why it hasn't been used by terrorist?

Now the perpetrator is defined as a "lone wolf". The result maybe like the case of assasination of President Kennedy. A scapegoat like Oswald to be found to finish the case.

After I put my opinion about this anthrax attack,(about one comment each week) someone put two follow-up:

Quote,"PalpableEvil Nov 9, 2001 GMT (#24 of 28)
Listen to me very carefully. You need to seek help from a professional psychiatrist. Please do it as soon as possible. You are suffering from a mental disorder known as acute paranoia. Please get help before you become a danger to your wife or family. Your life does not have to be this way. Things can be better. You have to take the first step to help yourself.

PalpableEvil </WebX?- 03:55am Nov 16, 2001 GMT )
Perhaps you did not read my message with the attention you should have given it. I strongly suggest that you see a psychiatrist before you endanger your family .
Must I warn you again? "

To set up a case of family tragedy of "murder and suicide "? I don't know. But I believe my comments make them very much uneasy.

[kathaksung]

It's dismay to learn that 94-year old woman died of anthrax on Nov. 21. She is a white. A response again to my post: "In my experience, scapegoat used to be minority, mostly black people. Hope this won't cause another cover up operation. (first put into internet on Nov. 13)"?

Her mysterious death is similar to Nguyen's, with no access to contamination of anthrax bacteria. Old, alone, an easy victim for a biology weapon murder. It's also an intimidation : They don't care to expand the bio-tech killing out of normal way.

On Nov. 16, an anthrax letter to Senator Leahy was found. Leahy is Chairman of intelligence committe which oversees Federal law enforcement agency. A right target to intimidate.

44. My tenant

As early as 1991, I noticed that friends and relatives were intimidated and estranged from me. And it's secret police' rule to stay as close as possible to monitor, either in living house or working place. In about 1993, there was a young man M often came alone to my house doing missionary work. Since other people came once, then never showed up again,(must have been interviewed and intimidated by surveillance agent) I thought he was an undercover. After I abandoned my work, fearing there would be a murder, he came again, this time with a strong man. M introduced him as his partner. For the first time, he asked me to let them into the house. I refused. I was afraid there would be a violence to me in the house. M never came to mission since.

My current tenant T rented a bedroom of my house two years ago when I was in South-east Asia. In same period, new neighbor moved into the house next to mine. To my experience, they are someone with special mission. He was a good tenant anyway. Visitors were rare. He always stay at his room. Never go outside except buying food or going to work. (Even in week ends) On Nov. 8, he came back home with a man. He said it's his former collegue, happened renting a bedroom in next house. I don't believe coincidence for a long time. The man's strong body remind me of the M's partner several years ago. I waited for his leaving until midnight. I told him I didn't want to see him again in my house because his late staying harassed my family. I did this out of security reason. Then on Nov.9 and Nov.16, two messages in web sites suggested I was a danger to my family. Which just convinced me that my worry is not over-sensitive. It's a reaction to my opinion on anthrax attack.

[kathaksung]

45. Tenant

I used to have lunch at 1 o'clock and supper at 7. T (tenant) used to have his at 2 and 10, rarely bothering us. At about Oct 19, he came down when I had my lunch. I thought he must have something to talk to me. He made it very straight. "What's your opinion about anthrax attack?" I made it straight too. "It's not from OBL terrorist, that's for sure. I think it's Federal law enforcement agency did it. They have motive and resource." I give him my reason. Anthrax was a hot topic with pages of them on newspaper then. I was worried about the safety of my relatives, four of them worked in post office. Though I was estranged from friends and relatives for a long time, there was one advantage: I don't have to guess true or false if they had a question. There was a purpose always. It seemed they really did something in anthrax attack that they even asked my opinion. That's why I broke the sequence of my thread starting on anthrax topic.

Several days later, T came down again when I had my lunch. He said he had seen such a news that morning: government arrested three people. One of them was suspicious because he held an envelope far from him with fear. And police found it was anthrax. These people came from middle east. So no doubt terrorist did anthrax attack. I said it was more like a cover up case. It was easy for law enforcement agent finding some Islamites eager to revenge and disguised as a scientist to sell them some anthrax to make a case. It would not resolve the motive and resource of recent anthrax attack. I pointed out that what I expected or worried about in last discussion came true or got a quick cover up response. (In 'Anthrax crisis 1, first posted on Oct. 21) T's story of anthrax attack by terrorist has ever shown in newspaper, though I saw several times in web sites.

Then happened on Nov. 8 that his friend coincidentally moving into my next house. T worked from 3 pm to 5 pm, two hours a day for food delivery. His friend is said unemployed. The first day they met, his friend stayed until midnight at my house. He could have stayed whole day everyday since if I would allow him to.

Then followed by PalpableEvil's intimidation on Nov.9 and Nov. 16. (see "42. intimidation").

On Nov. 18, there was another message from:
Quote,"texaswildkat 11/18/01 10:28 pm
I have passed your message along to a friend of mine who is undercover at the Sacramento Police Department. Either they, or another undercover investigator in the area, may contact you. Do not be afraid. Just tell them your story and I am sure they will help you. They may want to take you somewhere where you will be safe. Please trust them. Your friend "
I would rather take it a serious matter than a ridicule. When all these came together, I don't think it's a coincidence. I don't want disappeared mystically like Chandra Levy.

46. My view of anthrax attack

On Sept. 18, taking advantage of 911 WTC bombing, perpetrator mailed letters to NBC news. The anthrax inside was brown granular which might mean perpetrator intending at first not to kill but to intimidate.
Perhaps disappointed with little reaction, they did it again(on Oct. 8), this time with a military grade anthrax. The letter to Senator Daschle and Leahy contained fine, white powder which mixed with a material designed to kill. And a man, Bob Stevens, died of anthrax on Oct. 5. His death caused fear of bio-chem attack nation wide. Anthrax crisis reached its peak on about Oct. 20, then faded away. During the period, it created a situation of bio-attack horror, put a pressure on legislation to pass through "patriot Act" to let Justice Department having more police power, push media and public to support government's war policy and also gave an excuse for government to extend war to Iraq. (The "Patriot Act" was proposed on Sept. 24 and passed in legislature on Oct.24. US started war in Afghan on Oct. 7)

Rosenberg, a biologist, has testified on biological weapons before Congress, has recently published a paper contending that a government insider; or someone in contact with an insider, is behind the lethal attacks." (Excerpt from: San Jose Mercury News, page 9A,Dec. 2,2001. Topic:'Inside job probed in anthrax attack') One official (law enforcement agency) called Rosenberg theory " the most likely hypothesis".

I believe the anthrax attack was done by Federal law enforcement agency. They have motives and resources.
They are the one to be benefitted by the attack. They expanded their power by creating public's fear. They intimidated the media and legislation which are the check and balance to their power. They have the authority to access the secret lab under the name of 'security'. (like the case of Wen Ho Lee.)

And
1. The first victim is an editor of tabloid, a dislike of powerful US celebrities. His wife was the manager of apartments which had been rented to some 911 terrorists. He was possibly under FBI's surveillance. (consider thousand of aliens who even had no relationship to terrorist were detained by FBI)

2. Government released information that Atta visited crop duster aircraft. Hinted Al-quada relating to bio warfare. Matching perpetrators' intention to owe it to 911 terrorists.

3. Government released conflict information. Such like at first they said the material mixed in anthrax was bentonite, purposely to target at Iraq. Then admitted the material was silica, not used by Iraq, but US. It may proved that the perpetrators are not expert, only know little about the anthrax they were using and gave a wrong information when they making use of it.

4. At the same time, government released information that Atta made contact to Iraq diplomat. It matched the theory of bentonite, made Iraq a big suspect.

Most of these information can be only released by intelligence.

5. . Though government said first that there were 30 to 40 places had access to the anthrax and much more people could produce it by cheap equipment, it's only an excuse that they are unwill to find real criminal. The anthrax in Senator's letter is military grade. A fruit of years' research and experiment. And even in US there maybe only one secret lab carrying it. And access to it must be very strict.

6. US rejected a UN resolution condemning the anthrax attack. For what reason they did so if it's done by OBL, Al-quada, or domestic pertetrators? Unless it's done by they themselves.

7. My personal experience told it was a practice of Federal law enforcement agency. From their swift response to my comments. And I think they originally only planned one death(Bob Stevens) to raise the public attention and fear. The later four deaths were cover up to the comment " Least casualties to raise public's scare".

This elected government administration tries to hide something from people. They started a war but failed to give evidence, said that was for safety of informant. Then they want a military tribunal, what secret do they want to keep even they win a war? On Dec. 10, newspaper reported that Russian scientists had helped OBL to produce anthrax. Workshop was bombed away in war, but unknown quantity of anthrax might have been in abroad already. There was no detail, obviously let out by military or intelligence. An attemption to owe anthrax attack to terrorist when they failed to find a scapegoat of lone wolf? Perhaps that's why they limited media's report in Afghan war, and want a secret court. When US is the strongest power in the world, why there are so many things to be hided? If we have reason believe those who being sent to court are guilty, a military court only covers up corrupt government and criminal activities of it's official.

[kathaksung]

47. Swift response

When I talked about swift response of cover up, (see #39. Anthrax crisis, who has motive and resource) there were more.

1. Two weeks ago I talked about T had his meal time different from our's. He then got a full time job. He now has his supper when we have our's despite inconvenience of a crowded kitchen. (See #45. Tenant)

2. I talked about Linda Trip on #29. "I am you, American.". Next day, eye catching thread about her news were posted next to my thread in web-sites I went.

Quote, "Your Tripp Needs YOU! Msg #629164 To: All 1 reply From: Jon fredersen <ProfileResults.asp?SRV=Republicans&HMN=626892&UID=jonfredersen> 10:18 p.m. on 22-Aug-2001

Ah, how have the beloved icons of Republican hate Clinton campaigns fallen in the esteem of their former friends....."

Quote,"1 of 20. dwbh <user.php?op=userinfo&uname=dwbh> Point Pleasant, NJ |
Posted: 2001-08-23 13:03
LINDA TRIPP BEGS FOR A JOB
By NEAL TRAVIS and WILLIAM NEUMAN

August 22, 2001 -- Sexgate squealer Linda Tripp is crying poverty in a fund-raising letter sent to Republican supporters - in which she says she can no longer pay her rent, buy food or support her family....."

I don't know if losing a job can prove she is not a "volunteer". What impressed me was the swift cover up reaction. It seems there is a pretty big team working surveillance on me.

3. About October, G-lady and her husband visited us. The husband lost his lucrative contract one month ago. He is a computer programme designer and got the contract about six years ago, about the time G-lady guided my wife to the tour company which had trouble later. How lucrative the contract was? They lived in a nice location and their children are all attending private school. G-lady doesn't have a formal job. She works as an outside sales for tour company. May be paid only several hundred dollars a month. Her husband has never come to my home before. This sudden visit must had some intention. To prove me something like Linda trip's? A month ago? I recalled it was the time I posted the message"32. Operation Fire Dragon". I don't believe coincidence. I don't know how Federal law enforcement agency's policy how to treat their paid or unpaid volunteers. But if Mrs. Churchill could allegedly been put to death just out of suspicion, what else can't they do?

48. Test

Last week end, B (my Youngest brother in law) came to my house, he dropped a gift for my daughter at doorway then left.

Another relative of my wife came the other day, dropped a bag of gifts at doorway and left right away too.
We rarely met her and never exchange X'mas gift. It was a big surprise she came to my house.

I get used to these scenes since 1991. People are intimidated. I think they were forced to do this. Though the pressure never stopped, I feel extra heavy after I comment the anthrax attack was likely from federal law enforcement agency. It looks like they try to circle profitable source while they are framing new case. B is a business man and the relative's husband is a doctor. They are rich.

I worry about B's family because they'll take a cruise trip next week. It's easy to make an accident in travel. B is a work addict. He works seven days a week. He never takes a fun trip for missing a business day, especially in hard time after 911. I knew it's against his will. I hope there will be no accident in plane or ship which in a time easily owing it to terrorist.