The dark side of USA

[kathaksung]

Quote, "Statement by

Lieutenant General Robert L. Schweitzer
U.S. Army (Retired)

before the

Joint Economic Committee
United States Congress

June 17, 1997
Radio Frequency Weapons and the Infrastructure

Low cost per engagement
All weather
Instantaneous engagement times
Simplified pointing and tracking
Possible to engage multiple targets
Deep magazines-simplified logistics (can "fire" or pulse as long as there is power in the generator)
Non-lethal to humans when properly adjusted
Well suited to covert operations because of lack of signature; deniability
Not able to detect attacks; silent when used without explosive devices "

http://www.house.gov/jec/hearings/espionag/schweitz.htm

[kathaksung]

85. Chinese secret police and DNA (9/1)

There are four houses in the lane I live. Two at the entrance of the lane. Let's call them A,B house. Two at the bottom of lane. Let's call them C, D. I live in C. My house shares a common wall with D house.

The families of A, B, actually didn't live there. Agent might have moved them to somewhere nearby, according to my observation. But their furniture and belongings were still there as a disguise. And they still come back from time to time to pick up their belongings. I often told my relative as a story that people in A, B houses were not neighbor but agent who monitoring. And each time I talking about it, next day there always would be a show. My neighbor would play in lane, washing cars, riding bikes, made a large noise. But it only lasted about an hour or so. I call it swift response, and Emperor's new clothe's show.

B neighbor sold their house on February 2001. The new owner was a lady from China. So then B, C, D all lived by people from China. I felt Chinese secret police were heavily involved in.

On November, 2001, T(tenant) took a friend home, saying his friend happenedly rented a bedroom in D house. I feard there might be a violence because my view of anthrax attack. I rejected him right away that night. I haven't seen him ever since. T later said that his friend might have gone back to China. (story see #44. My tenant)

In late May this year, lady of B house suddenly came to visit T. I then knew they were aquaintance, too. T then told me the lady was selling B house. In early June, house A neighbor were absent too. No car in parking lot for days. Newspaper piled up, became yellow under sunshine. B house lady and T's sudden leaving, absence of A house alarmed me. I could only guess there would be something going to happen, so T had to leave to avoid be involved. But I couldn't find the reason why A, B houses were emptied. It left me a puzzle.

I stayed at home, feard there would be a police violence outside for me. Then found TIPS programe would directly send agent to my house.

On August 22, in the evening, B lady(who had sold B house already) came to my home, said she wanted to buy air tickets to China. (my wife is travel agent). She stayed about 30 minutes. At midnight that day, a lady knocked at our door, said she lived in D house,(but I don't know her)complained the sound of TV harassed her. This was an excuse obviously. My daughter's TV was in very low volume. Her room is oppsite to mine. I even didn't know she was watching TV when her door was closed. I kept alert on these ladies, didn't talk to them, left them for my wife. Next day in noon, two ladies (I've never seen before) came to visit my father in law. I kept away from them and stay washing in the kitchen. . But a lady aggresively came to the kitchen saying hello to me and self introduced herself. All these ladies came from China, and so densely visit my home in less than 24 hours. An aggressive frame attempt?

I noticed recently in newspaper there's a densely report about rape cases. In which they using DNA cleared several suspects. One was cleared even he had admitted he committed rape crime when he was arrested. It seemed they were going to set up the authorization of DNA test that it could decide everything. But DNA, just like other evidence, can be planted. They can easily collect victim's hair, sperm and plant it like a gun. Especially the victim is under 24 hours surveillance. And all rubbish are in scrutiny. Even dirty water in drainage.

86. FISA Secret Court ruling

In Aug. 23, newspaper reported that "Secretive federal court that approves spying on terror suspects has refused to give the Justice Department broad new powers in the war on terrorism, saying government misused the law and misled the court. The court was so concerned by A.G. Ashcroft's behind-the-scenes efforts to broaden the FBI's spying abilities that the court in May secretly ordered Ashcroft to scale back the regulations."

I then knew I had been under surveillance of FISA warrant. The news also resolved my puzzle of why T and B house lady's sudden leaving and the absence of House A in early June. That's the result of court's scale back the regulations.

I reviewed my message from May and found my observation were correct very much. It reflects how Ashcroft and FBI reacted when they lost FISA warrant in later May.
1. Turn on into local police and ploted police violence. (see message from #67 to #77) The plot mainly planed in June and July.
2. When I stayed at home to avoid their murder attemption, Ashcroft announced TIPS plan in July and would apply it in practice on August. A plan to send agent direct to the house, and use informant's report to replace FISA warrant. (#80. TIPS)
3. The unusual visits of Chinese ladies in August 22, 23 probably was a burst rage to the released opinion of judges of Secret Court. An effort for another frame case.

Report said there was rage in meeting room between Judges and officials of DOJ. It is understandable. The culture of FBI is rogue style. Because unchecked power they behaved like commander. They burst into rage if being checked. Just like those who criticize Ashcroft eroding civil liberty were laballed "aiding enemy", "unpatriot". Under such a pressure judges were forced to announce their opinion, first time in history of Secret Court.

What's the problem in this dispute?

FISA is an Act aimed at agent of foreign country, or terrorist(after 911). It used in foreign intelligence investigation. The warrant is issued in very low standard. It can't be used in criminal investigation.(domestic) Because US citizen is protected by 4th Amendment from unreasonable search and seizure.

Ashcroft argue that Patriot Act give DOJ the power to share intelligence gained from FISA with criminal investigation, if it comes to true, then 4th Amendment means nothing. Through the hand of foreign government, a US citizen can be under surveillance and be searched at any time.

FBI is notorious for abusing power. To get a warrant, they gave wrong information to the judge. It's cheating, or what they said, "error". In early 2000, my application of asylum in Thailand first revealed their cheating. Freeh was said had resigned once but stayed in his position. When I went back to US and revealed more in internet, Freeh resigned from his post. But still planed an failed 'June framed case'. These, maybe what the court opinion said "misuse of law and misled the court", done by DOJ and FBI during Clinton administration. Then there was failed "May 3 frame case". Though it was done by FBI district Chief, "Ashcroft's behind scene efforts" played an important role. And I think once again, Judges found they were cheated by DOJ and FBI. This led to Sceret court's May 17 order to scale back the regulation.

[kathaksung]

87. Flooding (9/13)

Flooding is a common way DEA, FBI used to detect if there is any valuable things in people's home. (see story in "4. Burglary and flooding")

In early August, my wife said she is going to re-model bathroom. Alerted by Ashcroft's TIPS programe, I'm afraid this might be another attempt to send agents direct to the house. I adviced my wife that her plan would empty saving's book. We should keep a little money for emergence. She insisted on her idea. She made a call right away, spoke loudly to instruct contractor how to get to our house. I asked how did she know this contractor. She said it was from newspaper. My wife choked up when I requested to see that newspaper. She had none. I felt she was manipulated to do so. I made it straight it might be undercover agents. That I didn't care about detection but did worry of violence and planting. I declared I would reject any coming contractor. My wife went into the room, made a call with low voice. I thought she reported to her handler. The said contractor never appear.

On Sept. 5, an article in "World Journal" caught my eye. A man said his drainage was blocked frequently, then caused flooding. He learned from internet that there was a "camara in pipe" service
nearby. He asked one which resolved his problem. It found the root of tree growing inside the drainage. Since many strange things occured recently, and I was familiar with the tactic of pre-propaganda and advice by agents, (see "66. Turn innocent into criminal") I had a strong feeling that it might be another attemption of "go into house" tactic. I told my wife, "Be careful, there maybe a flooding."

Though I foresaw a flooding, I didn't expect it come so fast. On Sunday, Sept.8, when we were washing clothes, there was a big flooding from wash machine. While cleaning the water I told my wife, "If you still remember the warning I said two days ago.". Of course, I wouldn't ask for "camara the pipe" service. My wife bought a tool in store. I cleand the pipe with that tool.

88. Foreign hand

On Sept. 11, an article "Bush lawyer backs new search policy" said, "A Bush administration lawyer defended the government's new policy of allowing its law enforcement investigators to press for secret searches of suspected foreign agents, saying Tuesday that this co-ordinated approach is needed in the war on terrorism.... If the FBI can show that a person is linked to a "foreign power" or terrorist group, its agents can wiretap him, even if they have no evidence of wrongdoing."(S.J.M.N. 9/11/02)

It explains why different Chinese ladies visited my house three times within 24 hours on Aug.22 and 23. Some of them are Chinese secret police, I suspected. A lady even visited at midnight, a trick often used by agents in trap. (see "49. Frame attemption" and "54. Trap") Though they acted to cooperation with FBI, the report could be, "Foreign agents visit Kat Hak Sung", even could be with picture as evidence. Thus a FISA warrant was easily issued.

Nobody can avoid to contact foreigners. If you know none, they can aggressively creat some. Especially when foreign police co-ordinated with FBI and CIA.

A news in last October said Atta had contacted an Iraq diplomat in Czech in Spring and talked about a bombing plot. Though the news was originally designated to frame Iraq that it had links to 911 terrorist, it also revealed Atta was under surveillance by intelligence earlier. After I pointed out this, months later, Czech government said the news might be wrong. Our intelligence can made foreign country let out conflict information to cover up their flaws.

Are American citizens still under protection of the Constitution from unreasonable search and seizure?

[kathaksung]

86. FISA Secret Court ruling

In Aug. 23, newspaper reported that "Secretive federal court that approves spying on terror suspects has refused to give the Justice Department broad new powers in the war on terrorism, saying government misused the law and misled the court. The court was so concerned by A.G. Ashcroft's behind-the-scenes efforts to broaden the FBI's spying abilities that the court in May secretly ordered Ashcroft to scale back the regulations."

I then knew I had been under surveillance of FISA warrant. The news also resolved my puzzle of why T and B house lady's sudden leaving and the absence of House A in early June. That's the result of court's scale back the regulations.

I reviewed my message from May and found my observation were correct very much. It reflects how Ashcroft and FBI reacted when they lost FISA warrant in later May.
1. Turn on into local police and ploted police violence. (see message from #67 to #77) The plot mainly planed in June and July.
2. When I stayed at home to avoid their murder attemption, Ashcroft announced TIPS plan in July and would apply it in practice on August. A plan to send agent direct to the house, and use informant's report to replace FISA warrant. (#80. TIPS)
3. The unusual visits of Chinese ladies in August 22, 23 probably was a burst rage to the released opinion of judges of Secret Court. An effort for another frame case.

Report said there was rage in meeting room between Judges and officials of DOJ. It is understandable. The culture of FBI is rogue style. Because unchecked power they behaved like commander. They burst into rage if being checked. Just like those who criticize Ashcroft eroding civil liberty were laballed "aiding enemy", "unpatriot". Under such a pressure judges were forced to announce their opinion, first time in history of Secret Court.

What's the problem in this dispute?

FISA is an Act aimed at agent of foreign country, or terrorist(after 911). It used in foreign intelligence investigation. The warrant is issued in very low standard. It can't be used in criminal investigation.(domestic) Because US citizen is protected by 4th Amendment from unreasonable search and seizure.

Ashcroft argue that Patriot Act give DOJ the power to share intelligence gained from FISA with criminal investigation, if it comes to true, then 4th Amendment means nothing. Through the hand of foreign government, a US citizen can be under surveillance and be searched at any time.

FBI is notorious for abusing power. To get a warrant, they gave wrong information to the judge. It's cheating, or what they said, "error". In early 2000, my application of asylum in Thailand first revealed their cheating. Freeh was said had resigned once but stayed in his position. When I went back to US and revealed more in internet, Freeh resigned from his post. But still planed an failed 'June framed case'. These, maybe what the court opinion said "misuse of law and misled the court", done by DOJ and FBI during Clinton administration. Then there was failed "May 3 frame case". Though it was done by FBI district Chief, "Ashcroft's behind scene efforts" played an important role. And I think once again, Judges found they were cheated by DOJ and FBI. This led to Sceret court's May 17 order to scale back the regulation.

87. Flooding (9/13)

Flooding is a common way DEA, FBI used to detect if there is any valuable things in people's home. (see story in "4. Burglary and flooding")

In early August, my wife said she is going to re-model bathroom. Alerted by Ashcroft's TIPS programe, I'm afraid this might be another attempt to send agents direct to the house. I adviced my wife that her plan would empty saving's book. We should keep a little money for emergence. She insisted on her idea. She made a call right away, spoke loudly to instruct contractor how to get to our house. I asked how did she know this contractor. She said it was from newspaper. My wife choked up when I requested to see that newspaper. She had none. I felt she was manipulated to do so. I made it straight it might be undercover agents. That I didn't care about detection but did worry of violence and planting. I declared I would reject any coming contractor. My wife went into the room, made a call with low voice. I thought she reported to her handler. The said contractor never appear.

On Sept. 5, an article in "World Journal" caught my eye. A man said his drainage was blocked frequently, then caused flooding. He learned from internet that there was a "camara in pipe" service
nearby. He asked one which resolved his problem. It found the root of tree growing inside the drainage. Since many strange things occured recently, and I was familiar with thetactic of pre-propaganda and advice by agents, (see "66. Turn innocent into criminal") I had a strong feeling it might be another attemption of "go into house" tactic. I told my wife, "Be careful, there maybe a flooding."

Though I foresaw a flooding, I didn't expect it come so fast. On Sunday, Sept.8, when we were washing clothes, there was a big flooding from wash machine. I told my wife, "If you still remembe the warning I said two days ago."while cleaning the water. Of course, I wouldn't ask for "camara the pipe" service. My wife bought a tool in store. I cleand the pipe with that tool.

88. Foreign hand

On Sept. 11, an article "Bush lawyer backs new search policy" said, "A Bush administration lawyer defended the government's new policy of allowing its law enforcement investigators to press for secret searches of suspected foreign agents, saying Tuesday that this co-ordinated approach is needed in the war on terrorism.... If the FBI can show that a person is linked to a "foreign power" or terrorist group, its agents can wiretap him, even if they have no evidence of wrongdoing."(S.J.M.N. 9/11/02)

It explains why different Chinese ladies visited my house three times within 24 hours on Aug.22 and 23. Some of them are Chinese secret police, I suspected. A lady even visited at midnight, a trick often used by agents in trap. (see "49. Frame attemption" and "54. Trap") Though they acted to cooperation with FBI, the report could be, "Foreign agents visit Kat Hak Sung", even could be with picture as evidence. Thus a FISA warrant was easily issued.

Nobody can avoid to contact foreigners. If you know none, they can aggressively creat some. Especially when foreign police co-ordinated with FBI and CIA.

A news in last October said Atta had contacted an Iraq diplomat in Czech in Spring and talked about a bombing plot. Though the news was originally designated to frame Iraq that it had links to 911 terrorist, it also revealed Atta was under surveillance by intelligence earlier. After I pointed out this, months later, Czech government said the news might be wrong. Our intelligence can made foreign country let out conflict information to cover up their flaws.

Are American citizens still under protection of the Constitution from unreasonable search and seizure?

89. Polygraph law makers (9/25)

In early June, a news said the conversations between Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and Mohammed Atta were intercepted by NSA. It said in two separate conversations on Sept. 10, 2001 contained the pharases "Tomorrow is zero hour" and "The match is about to begin.". Since these two pharases are vague one and consider NSA intercepts 2 million conversations in each hour, the pick up of these two phrases was not a coincidence. It proves that Atta was under surveillance by government earlier before 911.

Then FBI said it was a secret intelligent information which shouldn't be let out public. They are investigating who has leaked it. They target on law makers and even request a polygraph.

But who will investigate the secret information leaking committed by intelligence itself?

When the news said Atta made contact to Iraq diplomat in Czech and talked about bombing plot, it leaked that Atta and Iraq diplomate were under surveillance and it leaked Czech intelligence was cooperated with USA.

There is another similar news release. By February 2001, NSA had broken the bin Laden's communications encryption system. What we know from the information government released is that OBL talked to his mother two days before 911 attack, "In two days, you're going to hear big news, and you're not going to hear from me for a while." It let people know that Bin laden's communication was under surveillance as long as 6 months before 911. And his communication code was broken.

Nobody could release such information but intelligence. Though the original purpose of news about Atta and Iraq diplomate was to target on Iraq to frame it linking with 911 terrorist, so administration could have excuse to start a war on Iraq. And the news of Bin Laden's intercepted conversation was used to find a legal base for Bush to start war in Afghan. These information leaking are as important as the Atta's "Tomorrow is zero huor" one. Why FBI had a blind eye on these secret leakings? Because they were released by intelligence?

The secret information leaking FBI accused took place in early June, at a time when lawmakers and 911 victims were going to investigate failure of intelligence of 911 attack with an independent commision. It could be a trap intelligence set. They use this method to retaliate, or extort law makers to avoid investigation on their own flaw or crime. Or to reach a compromise.

If we don't know these "secrecy", we will believe what government said that they had known nothing before attack. "Secret" is only a stonewall they used to cover up thier corruption.

90. Internet censorship (3)

I suffered many harassment in internet, mostly technical proplem. Slow entering is way they used to use. Recently they invented a new method to delay entering. They give an "error" page to lock up the whole screen, meanwhile my brewser would lost function. I have to wait for sometime until they set up everything. What kind of things they are settling? For some new web site, it's a routine they'll check first if I was allowed to enter. If not, the page next will be "Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request". Thus I was denied entering.

For some web site I have a thread already, they use "Hide and seek" censorship. In which when I click in, everything is normal. When I left, they took my thread away. Then for the most time, my thread was censored from readers. They could do this because I used to click in according to my "Favorite Places" list. The agent monitoring me saw that list too. So they knew which site I would go next and get everything ready. Everything looks normal until I occasionally broke sequence. (Sometimes I jumped back to the site I had been in hours ago to correct some mistakes) Then strange thing happened. I couldn't find my thread. After repeated search I made a complaint about missing thread. Then the missing thread appeared. They used to give a explanation to cover up. This is one from TB2000.com:

Quote, "Sysman (Senior Member)

This is what happens. As EVERY thread moves from page 1 to page 2, it gets "lost" for a few minutes, untill the next thread bumps it down 1 more. Then it shows up as the first thread on the second page, and the next thread is "lost" etc. etc. etc. "

Here is another explanation from realcities.com/

Quote, "MaxImmelmann RE: Strange thing 06/07/02 10:57AM

.... This board has the occasional problem, and yesterday was just one of those days. ...

There was a straight comment to my complaint from other readers in quorum.org

Quote, "Free speach maybe not. posted 08/03, by chickmcd </a-national/member/chickmcd/bio>

Free speech may not be allowed here. Some replies or polls on certain subjects seem to get deleted or lost. It would seem that if you are critical about certain things or lifestyle choices your thoughts may be censored"

The funny thing is when I went back to quorum.org, after sometime, the missing thread would re-surfaced. They tried to assure me everything was normal.

Now when I tried a random click in, what they did is lock up my screen browser, made me wait until they get everything ready. It substantially slowed my internet surfing. That's how Ashcroft's cyberteam work. They not only monitor, they also harass and censor, in a covert way.

91. Turn to State legislature (10/6)

When Federal judge and legislature found DOJ and FBI abusing power and rebuked them. DOJ and FBI seems turn to on State legislature. Newspaper reported meeting of DOJ with FISA court judge in May, August then with legislature on Sept.11.

Two days later, news reported " SIMON TRIUMPHS IN FRAUD CASE RULING
Republican Bill Simon's faltering quest to unseat Democratic Gov. Gray Davis received a boost Thursday when a judge overturned a $78 million fraud verdict that had placed the investor's fledgling political career in jeopardy.
In an unusual move, Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant rejected the civil jury's conclusion that Simon's investment firm had defrauded the owner of a pay telephone company by crafting a risky plan to take the firm public."

California Governor Gray Davis thus will face threat from his rival Bill Simon. The unusually thing is the judge who made the decision is nominated by Republican. At this time the verdict obviously benefits Republican in election. And it is rare that a judge overturning the conclusion of a jury.

A news on 9/17 surprised me. " DOCUMENTS ILLUSTRATE SIMON'S TAX DEAL TECHNIQUE CALLED FRAUD IN IRS SUIT AGAINST FIRM THAT SOLD STRATEGY " It's a negative news against Bill Simon. The media is manipulated by intelligence, did they change their mind? Not really, it seems like a new round of interest exchange. A news same day said, "GOVERNOR EXPANDS STATE WIRETAP LAW California's little-used wiretap law is expected to become more popular with police and prosecutors under a bill signed Monday and an initiative that received court clearance earlier this year.
Gov. Gray Davis extended its use to investigations of those suspected of crimes involving bombs, bioterrorism and weapons of mass destruction when he signed a series of anti-terrorism laws."

I think Federal agent's behind scene effort made this "unusual move" of judge, and pushed Davis to extend "little-used" wiretap law. They pick up something from state which they lost in Federal.

92. Internet censorship (4)

On 10/4, I posted a message "Oppose war with Iraq" in a web-site of Yahoo. It failed to be listed. I then posted another message, it was listed instantly. So I tried "Oppose war with Iraq" again, but failed again. It seems the agent monitoring me hated that message very much and handle all my internet posting instantly. I used to leave if I was blocked to post. But this time I wrote a message "Selective post" to protest. They must have seen the complaint while I was writing. When I finished the complain message, the blocked two messages were in list already. The sequence in list is:
#20720. FBI knew Heaven's Gate suicide in advance (Oct.4 11:28)
#20722. Oppose war with Iraq (Oct.4 11:30)
#20723. Oppose war with Iraq (Oct.4 11:30)

I checked 20722 which ought to be posted before 20720. Inside page shows the posting time is 11:27. They released it when they saw I writing complain message.

It took place in "Debate and More"

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Debate...5?viscount=-30

The article "Oppose war with Iraq" had been posted in "Newsmax.com" and "quorum.org", but both were moved away from list while my other messages are untouched. What's wrong with it? (see 93)

93. Oppose war with Iraq
It seems the war on Iraq is inevitabel. Because this war is for the interest of Israel. And you can see the tremendous influence of Israel here, both on politicians and media. (The weak reaction of Democratic Party and less of criticism of media) Anyhow I'll try my best to express my opinion to politicians. If people are agree with my opinions, (either all or part of them) I welcome them to share with it for their convenience. The following is the e-mail I have mailed to politicians.
The honorable
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator
I'm writing you to oppose any authorization the war power to President Bush and his Cabinet at this movement.
I urge you to oppose war on Iraq because of the following reason:
1. There is no sufficient justification to start such a war. President Bush accused Iraq of intending to build up mass destruction weapons which will used to attack US. He has no strong evidence. In reality, Iraq shows intention to accept unconditional weapon's inspection.
2. The war only benefit the rich people with interest in military and oil industry and a particular country (Israel). US people will bear the cost alone. Which means Americans must pay money and blood for the interest of minority people at a time US economy in a down turn.
3. War can not solve problem. War in Afghan killed a lot of innocent people. The main target Bin Laden is still at large. Al Quada scattered all over the world.
4. War only create hostility and enemy. It will help Al Quada to recruit more soldiers. US people will face an endless terror threaten. And we have no bunker, secret service for our security and we can't afford for a private flight.
5. Losing support from allies. Most countries are against war on Iraq. We are losing friends and sympathy of the world. The profile of US hurt badly.
6. Perhaps most important is it will help a dictatorship in US. If a policy is not based on legitimacy and common value but personal will and unilateral opinion, it's dictatorship not democracy.
In conclusion, I urge you oppose to authorize President Bush having a war on Iraq. Let U.N. take over the matter of Iraq.
Sincerely
Kat Hak Sung

[kathaksung]

94. Interest exchange (10/19)

In June, newspaper reported, "Lai Changxing, accused of heading one of the biggest crime rings in communist China's history, was taken into custody Friday in Vancouver, B.C., after he was denied refugee status in Canada." It's a big case of smuggling and tax elusion. Seven people were executed already, ten were sentenced to death.(Many of them were high ranking government officials) His deportation was unusual because he would be certainly put to death if he was back to China. Canada forbids any deportation if the deportee will face death. What made Canada made such a decision which is conflict to its law? I alleged there was a secret deal behind the scene. Lai was abruptly arrested in the morning of 6/21 and sent to the Vancouver International airport. At the edge of being deported, he then was dramatically transferred to detain center. A deal was postponed for some reason, I thought.

In message "69. Juror summon (6/16) " and "71. Police violence", I talked about I was summoned for jury service. The duty time was between 6/17 to 6/21. I alleged they arranged a police violence for me in that week. I also alleged they would frame up a drug case(with the help of Chinese police) to my family members because they knew my story and could be witness. 6/21 was Friday, the day they preferred to make arrest because there would be two extra days for them to do 'suicider job' inside jail. 6/21 must be the last day of their plan, Lai's arrest and deportation should have been in plan too. Only at last minute they canceled the plan because I didn't go to their trap. Lai, after a scary day of 6/21, still remained as a chip to deal with Chinese police.

All this is my speculation. It could be a coincidence. So I have not talked about it. But there was another event to test it. In early October, "World Journal"(Chinese edition) reported again, "Chinese government sent police officials to Canada, a pre-preparation for the depotation of Lai Changxin."Do they have another deal, or do they revive the old deal?" I thought. In 10/11, I received a notice from my Homeowners' Association.

95. A notice for a meeting

There is a Homeowners Association in my community. When people bought the house, he automatically became a member of it. There was an annual meeting held in the end of year to elect a board. The board took a property inspection every 3 or 4 months to make sure the community keeping neat and clean. There used to be dozens of homeowners attending the annual meet, asking question about property inspection. After drug case happened, it dropped down to several people, then in another meeting when I found I was the only attender in addition to three board members, I abandoned it too. For years the inspection went on regularly but stopped after drug case happened The result was this community looked like had been deserted. House looked old, lawn became barren. I thought it was because when my case became a frame case, they moved away residents of this community. The agent don't want them see the truth. And agents use electrical weapons to punish and kill. The ray can penetrate house and hurt neighbors. So it's convenient for them to work if residents were their own people. And new owners of the house must be agents who had no intention to take care of house, it's not their property. That's why my community suddenly looked like to be deserted for the rest years in 90's.

In 2001, they suddenly revived property inspection after about 8 years abandon. At a time they decided to frame big case to end this ten years' nightmare. I think they try to make a good price for the houses they occupied if the community looked beautiful. In April 2002, I received a letter from board manager, it's a second notice to request the garage and house trim to be re-painted. I painted them in early June. Then in August, I received a third notice for same accusation. I was surprised. My neighbor's house A and B were still in old shape with old paint. A's garage connects with mine. There is an obvious different look with new paint and old one. Nobody will make a mistake. There is address number board on the wall of garage and on my front door. If inspector can see the color of paint, they see the address board too.

I called several times to the manager, only found an answering machine there. I had left message. There was no response. So I wrote a certified letter to complain. Again, there is no response.

The new notice of 10/11 repeated the same accusation and said if the request items not repaired before 10/29, "YOU WILL BE FINED." It also said there will be a special meeting held on 10/29 evening for those had third time notice for explaining why they couldn't fix it. It's obvious they try to force me to go out for a meeting by consistent wrong accusation. The tactic is similar to June's Jury Summon trap.

Why choose 10/29? That's the day my parents will leave for China. And several days later another brother in law of mine will finish his one month vacation in China going back to US. Drug case is easy to be framed in airport. If the plan goes through, then Lai Cheongxin will be deported at that time. Secret police of each country will get what they want. (Lai's future may be different after this message published. They always made a swift response to my message. see "47. Swift response")


Re: The letter to manager of Association


"October 17, 2002

F, Association Manager
*** Management Corporation
************
San Mateo. CA 94404

Dear F,

I received your notice of October 10, 2002. In which you repeated accusation of maintenance failure: "Gutters/downspouts on garage(3), trim on house and garage-need repaint(3)." The accusation is unfounded, they were all re-painted about four months ago.

Since I couldn't reach you by phone call, I have written you a certified letter to reply your last notice of Aug. 15. I should like to know why I haven't got any reply from you and why you repeated the wrong inspection material. I'd also like to know 1. who did that inspection and how they reached that result. The telephone and mailing address for connection. 2. The name and telephone and address of Board directors, I have a complaint. I've made call to you four times, in different time, all answered by tape. So I request an explanation in writing.

Sincerely

Kat Hak Sung"


The certified mail number of first letter: 7002 1000 0004 5742 3784

96. Follow up (11/1)

In 10/28, I asked my wife to come back home early next day to attend the meeting. I said firmly I wouldn't go because I thought it was another trap. In 10/29, one hour before the meeting time, a lady came to my house said she was the board member. She later apologized for the wrong accusation.

They could do whatever to reach their goal, set up trap, lying, harass, frame. When it was revealed, "my mistake", "error" are the convenient words for it. But if victims follow their "error", the victims will lose their lives and property.

Follow up (2) of Judi Bary's case in "60. Plant, Frame and alleged murder ".

I posted Judi Bary's story on 3/25/2002. Several days later, I was surprised to read the news that her case was going to trial on 4/8/2002. Judi brought the case to the court in 1991. It was delayed again and again. Judi herself couldn't see the trial. She died of breast cancer in 1997 which I alleged a radiation murder. On 6/11/2002, the jury found FBI and Okland police lied in the case and violated victim's Constitution right of 1st Amendment and 4th Amendment. Judge ruled a 4.4 million compensation. The late justice came after 11 years dragging. I thought it was a swift response to my message. They try to clean up the odds. Anyway, it's a small case for them.

I'm surprised at their influence on judicial system. They could dragging a case as long as 11 years(could have been longer). And then finish it in less than three months.

Follow up(3) of John Gotti's cancer in "58. Manipulating media and killing by radiation"

On 10/30, 2000, San Jose Mercury News (CA)

Quote, "EX-MOB BOSS GOTTI REPORTEDLY DYING OF CANCER

John Gotti, the alleged head of the Gambino crime family who is serving a life prison term for murder, has neck and mouth cancer, and doctors give him less than a year to live, .... .

Doctors consulted by Gotti's family believe the cancer can be traced to neglect of his dental implants during his...."

On 3/07, 2002, I posted a message alleged his cancer to radioactive dental implant.

On 6/11/2002, S.J.M.N. reported his death.

quote, "Ex-crime-family boss Gotti dies of cancer

..... The cause was cancer. In 1998, he was operated on in a prison hospital for neck and head cancer."

My message alleged a radioactive polluted dental which caused cancer was first posted on March, 2002. When doctor said the cancer can be traced to dental implant, they must base on fact the cancer area was around the dental implant. Neck cancer should be because the location of neck was near that dental implant. Gotti could survive longer then doctor's predication of "less than a year to live, .... . ", possibly by moving away the dental implant when it was found caused problem.

Now what you can get from the death report? They demolished everything which might connect to dental implant, even not mentioned mouth cancer. What is the purpose? Most ridiculous is they invented a "head cancer". I'm so innocent to hear it for the first time.

I think after I posted message about Gotti, they hurried to produce a "head cancer" to cover the 'dental implant' and 'mouth cancer'. The usual way, I guess, is to contaminate the pillow with radioactive material to cause brain cancer and skin cancer... (breast cancer if used on bra). If what I said is true, I'm sorry for Gotti. Though he is a mob, he got the punishment from law already. The method they used on him was too cruel and inhuman.

Follow up(4) to dog mauling case of "62. Plot", " 63. A well planed frame case"

On 3/21/2002, Marjorie Knoller was convicted of second degree murder in fatal dog mauling and faced 15 years to life sentence. It was the first time in California such case was convicted. Newspaper cheered for the conviction, saying it was public's opinion.

I thought in different way. In mid April, I posted my opinion, alleged it was a well conducted frame case.

On 6/17, a judge overturned the conviction, ruled it an involuntary manslaughter. Both owners of the dog were sentenced 4 years for the case in July. Newspaper said it was a stunning twist in one of state's most unusual cases. I don't know if my revelation played something in it. But it is one of the most unusual cases anyhow. I believe Wipple's death was unnecessary. She was a victim of a plot, so be owners of the dog.


Follow up(5) to Carnaham's death of "31. Extortion"

Senator Wellstone's death. There was a similar event like his death. An airplane accident happened 2 years ago when Ashcroft competed with Carnaham for the Senator of Missori. Carnaham and Wellstone both died at an election which the number of Senators of both parties are in subtle balance. Any loss will lead to the control of the house to the opposite. And I think it was also because Paul Wellstone voted "no" on resolution of war power of Iraq. The group inside government determine to carry on the war with Iraq.

97. Internet attack (11/13)
There are three big attempts of frame-up cases on me. The first one was in early June, 2001 which using 6/11(McVeigh's execution) as a diversion of public's attention. Next one was in 5/3/2002. The latest one is 10/29/2002 which might using 11/5 Mid-term election to divert the public's attention.
Similar to the previous attempts, the latest one came with internet attack too. Two web sites announced a sudden shut down without pre-notice like Fox news. They were Times(people's.com) and LAtimes.com. My message were deleted or moved away from "Forums.about.com/cs-politics". In several web sites, someone used a similar name to harass. (In June 2001 attack, they used an identical name to defame, see "15. Using identical name to defame" in "Why DEA,FBI involved in secret deal of spy plane") Which led readers thought I as a psycho.

"void Posting to Psycho Troll KATHUKSANG
From: The Anti ALLAH!!!! <<http://www.delphiforums.com/plus.htmOct-27>

Quote, "Avoid any contact with the Patheticaly addled PSYCHO troll known on the net as KATHUKSANG,.."

In another site(kerrang.com), that "kathuksang" directly posted in my thread to harass for the same purposes.

The most serious offense took place in <http://www.wmi.org/multi_boards/politics/index.html>

"Tony H. (65.64.79.57) <mailto:.> from OKLAHOMA
Kat Hat Sung is a REAL person. He is 55 years old and resides in San Jose California, telephone # 408-***-****. He really does BELIEVE all the weird stuff he puts out !!! Won't give the address but the FBI does keep close tabs on him !!!!

Tony H. (65.64.79.57) <mailto:.> from OKLAHOMA says Oops Sorry
In doing a little research he was indicted in absentia some years back for Heroin smuggling on the West Coast....."

He posted my real phone number there, defamed me as a indicted drug smuggler. I protested to host, these messages were removed. His "absentia" verdict remind me of another two "absentia" verdict which took place in June 2001 attack.

Re: "The death of Kat Hak Sung <<http://brumley.com/boards/politicsmessages/227.html>> - FBI - 6/07/2001

Kat Hak Sung!
You have been sentenced to DEATH in absentia!
Surrender, soon, or we will KILL you!
Turn yourself in, and serve your DEATH sentence!
The DEATH of Kat Hak Sung is near! " one is more clear. Notice 3*24 hours from the posting date is 6/11/2001, McVeigh's execution date.
<http://forum.asiaco.com/1937-truth>

Author:FBI <mailto:FBI@hotmail.com> (66.44.60.9)
Subject:Your Time Is UP, Kat Hak Sung !Sat, Jun 9 2001 at 8:25 am[
Email Msg </cgi-bin/forum/forum.cgi?c=emailmsgform&fid=1937-truth&mid=27> | Invite </cgi-bin/forum/forum.cgi?c=inviteform&fid=1937-truth>

Message:Kat Hak Sung! Your time is up! We are giving you 3x24 hours to surrender. Turn yourself in to the local authority where you are residing now. You have been sentenced to DEATH in absentia. ..... Within 3x24 hours you should surrender and turn yourself in, to serve your death sentence under the gallows. The state of California has restored this kind of death sentence just for you. ....

These ruthless comments reflect how confident they were to their plan. If these plan worked out, a dead man could never protest and reveal all these flaws. They execute private punishment, they have their own private court, they extort and murder politicians even President. They think they are god.

98. A typical story of censorship attempt

This is what happened in late October in <http://www.rumandmonkey.com> . Which may suggested they really told people I was indicted in absentia in drug case.

The story showed how a moderator changed his attitude, using a convenient reason trying to fulfil a mission. Ben is a moderator, he thought my thread was a serious issue to debate, he foresaw the trouble of harassment and give a pre-warning. I did meet the trouble of harassment he foreseen. Then on Oct. 25 he changed his attitude......

Ben Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2002 2:17 am
I've moved this to Serious Debate. I can also read the future, so I'm reminding everyone right now that personal attacks aren't tolerated here, and repeated personal attacks, even in Personal Messages, will result in a banning.

Ben Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2002 1:29 am
I've sent him a Private Message; however, Kathaksung, I'd now ask that you participate in the discussion rather than just posting messages to the board. This is a discussion forum, and you must further conversation to conform to the terms and conditions. If you don't, I will be forced to ask you to leave.

kathaksung, Nov 6
If there is rational question, I'd like to discuss with them like I've done before. But how can I discuss with the message such like, "well, sorry, but this thread smells like ****, looks like ****, theres hoof prints walking away from it, and i hear mooing in the distance."? Or message implied that I have mental problem? It seems there are two different standards and some personal attack were neglected. That's the issue I like to discuss with you.

(I than posted a story and asked Ben if he was forced by government)

Ben
Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2002 12:40 am
To be more specific, I'm more likely to be being watched by the government than any of you. Unless some of you are actual criminals or something.

kathaksung Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2002 8:21 pm
That's true. When they need to censor speech they were uneasy for, the first one they looked for is moderator or administrator. Those who under the pressure had to find some excuse to do the order. Of course, to legalize their demand, they used to give some reason, mostly defame the victim as criminal or something. But if you have an independent mind, the same question will be up: Why they are so scare of the messages "unless they are actual criminals or something".

99. They are scare of my messages

In Sept. 2000, I started my thread to reveal the dark side of Federal law enforcement agency. Then found they managed several times to murder me. In each attempt of murder there always came with internet attack. Most obvious was after the failure of the first frame-up case in June, 2001. Next month in July, Ashcroft came to Bay area where I live announced a national cyber monitor programme. He created 9 teams to monitor the whole country which I alleged involved in harassment and censorship in internet. At the same time I got a message in NYtimes.com which may help you understand how they view my messages.

Quote, "Coyote954 01:45am Jul 12, 2001 EST

Kathaksung, I have an idea for you. Have you ever heard of a guy named Dick Marcinko? Well, he was a Navy SEAL, ....One day, he wrote a book about his experiences in the Navy SEALs, ....
The problem is, he told a lot of Navy secrets. They harassed him, ...-- but, he could write whatever he wanted as long as it was fiction!
So now he writes books about the Navy, and the SEALs, .....except that now he just says it is all fiction. .....
So... I tell you, your experience with these government operatives would be a great story, and if you just pretend that it is "fiction" everyone will know better and the gov't can't do anything to you. .....And, hey, as the guy that gave you the idea, I want 5%. "

kathaksung 04:54pm Jul 13, 2001 EST

coyote954,
Thanks for your suggestion. I have never sworn to FBI or DEA to keep their secret, so I have no obligation. What I put here are my personal experience, they are facts not fiction. If they want to send me to the court, I'd like to. What I need is not money, I need justice. Sorry you can't get your 5% but thanks anyway for your suggestion.

Kat Hak Sung

100. Power to spy on citizens expanded (11/24)

A news in 11/19 said "A federal appeals court ruled Monday that the Justice Department has broad powers to use wiretaps and other means to combat terrorism- a decision that will greatly expand the government authority to eavesdrop on Americans." The appeals court said the "Patriot Act" has given D.O.J. such a power although the congress insisted that it was not their intent.

It overturns the ruling of secret FISA court made in May. In which it caused dramatic reaction of agents who worked surveillance on me. (see "86. FISA Secret Court ruling" and "88. Foreign hand") Though they have never stop surveillance and harassment, now they get back legally. That proves their influence on Judiciary and their power is almost unchecked.

In 11/21, news said,"Senior FBI officials have grown frustrated with the bureau's performance in the war on terrorism, and they are dmanding that agents become more aggressive and single-minded in hunting terrorists. "and "They need to get out on the street and develop sources." Here I interpret "single-minded" imply to "freely make up decision by himself", "aggressive" imply to "do anything you want". "on the street and develop sources" imply to recruit gangs and mobs to have violence on the street. I'm familiar with such attemption. After May, there was court jury summon, letters for arranged meetings about my daughter's schoolarship though it's still 4 years away for her college entrance, even continuous false accusation to force me attending house inspection meeting. All attempts to lure me out to street.

How aggressive can they be? In Pratt's case, they framed him up as a murderer, and stopped other witness from testifying for him by planting false letters, almost would have executed him through the hand of US judiciary. In Judi Bary's case, to get rid of an environment activist, they even accused her of bombing herself.

Why they want to be aggressive with me? Because I am the witness of their crime. My revelation made them uneasy, especially the opinion about anthrax attack, government knowledgement of 911 attack, and sniper case.

[kathaksung]

101. Sniper case

I think the sniper case was done by government insider. It's a case similar to anthrax attack. I believe it was done by law enforcement agency. The anthrax attack was done to push congress for the passing through of "Patriot Act". The sniper case was done to push congress for passing resolution of authorization president with war power on Iraq.

The announcement of arrest of Mohammad and Malvo puzzled me. It seems evidence is strong, (especially Malvo admitted he was the shooter). I once thought I was wrong. But question emerged gradually. My suspicion on this case are:

(1) The sniper had to move away the back cushion of the seat when he intended to shoot. The only place he could put it on was the foot space for rear seat passenger. It's a big lump to handle in small compartment of Chevrolet Caprice. It would take sometime to move and settle it. And too, to put it back after shooting. The abnormal action would easy to be noticed. The Caprice is with glass windows.

(2) The sniper couldn't lay flat to shoot. He had to hold the rifle, so there was a height of his shoulder. His head must be upright to aim, so there was the height of his head over the shoulder. Was the luggage compartment that high for him? The rifle is long. If the distance from shoot hole to the back of front seat is 6 feet, a foot to two (from the aim point to gun end), must be deducted from 6 feet length. Then. there is only 4 feet and something left. There is hardly enough space for a sniper lay down to shoot.

(3) The hole is small ( News said it was blocked by a glove). Then the view of sniper is limited.

(4) In shooting events, people couldn't figure out where the shooting came from. It's reasonable to think that a silencer was used. But no silencer was found in Caprice. If the silencer was used, the lenth of rifle must be longer than privious assumption.

(5) The shooting were one shoot a death. Even a sharp shooter need a nice situation to result it. It's hard to believe he could do this in a car like this. I still believe a cargo van or a box van was more likely used in the case as other witness saw.

In early November, a news inspired me. I posted a message in several sites as early as in 11/2 to doubt on the case.

"(1) Is Muhammad real sniper?

Is he real sniper? Many people said he intended to be caught by deliberately left many clues. Generally, a serial killer used to admit it when police knocking at his door. But though media were full of topic of "death penalty", it seems a propaganda to plant an idea to the public that Muhammad is the real sniper. Not much people are aware of that....

Muhammad Interrogation In Dispute
U.S. Attorneys Cut Off Talks, Local Prosecutor Alleges
By Susan Schmidt and Katherine Shaver
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, October 31, 2002; Page A01

Quote, "In the hours after his capture, sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad ranted at investigators, denying ownership of the car that he was arrested in and the Bushmaster rifle found inside it, Justice Department officials said yesterday.

FBI agents and Montgomery County detectives questioned Muhammad over a five-hour period at a secret location Thursday, trying to get him to say something that would help prosecutors build their case against him and John Lee Malvo. But Muhammad did not answer any questions about the shootings, officials said."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2002Oct30.html

(2) 17 years old now becomes expert sniper? (posted after Nov. 10)

If you believe at the right beginning in what media said Muhammad is an expert sniper and so and so. Now it goes to the other end. It seems they have to put the suspicion on Malvo, a 17 years old illegal immigrant from Jamaica now became the "expert sniper" who did one shoot a death.

Quote, "Officials Link Most Sniper Killings to Teenager

November 10, 2002
By JAYSON BLAIR

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9 - Senior law enforcement officials said
today that evidence suggested Lee Malvo, the 17-year-old charged in the Washington-area sniper shootings, was the gunman in most of the attacks that left 10 dead.

The officials said investigators did not believe that Mr. Muhammad could fit in the trunk of the Caprice, where a hole had been hollowed out in the back and a seat modified so a gunman could fire from the back of the car. "The trunk
is very small and Malvo is much smaller than Muhammad," one
official said."

I posted my opinion on 11/2, this news on 11/10 proves it. Remember so far the evidence government given can be planted. The two were not directly found or arrested on the shooting site.

Then why the two were chosen to be the "snipers"?

102. Gang manipulation (12/6)

In "62. Plot" I talked about Federal attorney whom unusually involved in a state gang case, trying to expand death penalty on gang members of Nuestra Familia. I alleged the dramatic Federal intervention was an attempt to reach a deal of "murder for less penalty bargain". And I realized then agents would frame a big drug case to kill many people by the hands of prison gang.

This November an article I found in internet proved it. The article "The FBI's crime syndicate
San Francisco lawyer charges feds with "outrageous misconduct"

Quote, "For seven months the FBI effectively masterminded the illegal activities of a heavily armed northern California crime syndicate, according to a motion filed Sept. 30 in federal court.".....

"The FBI, through its informant Daniel "Lizard" Hernandez, "directed the delivery of firearms and drugs, approved of plans to commit home invasion robberies, passed on authorizations for violence against out-of-favor former gang members, encouraged violence to protect the gang's interests, and eventually failed to prevent the killing of Raymond Sanchez and wounding of Joseph Cantu,"

The gang is Nuestra Familia. Raymond Sanchez was executed on 5/21/2001. 21 gansters were indicted in June 2001. I've talked about my drive license was due on 5/24/2001 which might have been planed as an important evidence in Federal agent's frame plot. And they even delayed McVeigh's execution date to 6/11/2001 to diverge public attention from a would be slaughter in prison. The motion said FBI mastermined this operation for 7 months. 7 months from Sanchez's death was November 2000, the time of publishing of the article "Killing Pablo". I talked about this in "62 Plot". The time they decided to frame a drug case and started operation.

If their plot had come to true that me and others whom know the truth were detained in jail, 21 killer gangsters had been there already. I think my abandon of renewal of drive license and revelation in internet soured their plan.

This motion (9/30/2002) is from the lawyer who represents one of another 16 defendents still awaiting trial in Sanchez's death. (5/31/2001). Consider there was another murder attempt in October, (see "94. Interest exchange", "95. A notice for a meeting"), it looks like that agents still want to use Nuestra Familia's mob in new plot?

http://sfbg.com/37/02/news_fbi_misconduct.html


103. Aggressive response

Serial killer had his own particular way to murder. Each criminal had his own characters. So did Federal agents. Their skill is manipulating their informants, gansters to work for them.

When high ranking FBI demanded agents to be "aggressive and get out on the street and develop sources", (see "100 Power to spy on citizens expanded") I immediately thought of it would be another attempt to manipulate gangsters to murder.

Within days of that FBI memorandum, there was a news: "4 men killed in Salinas, Gang violence" (S.J.M.N. 12/2/02)

It said that 4 apparent gang rivalries were killed last week.(late November) That Hugo Sanchez, was walking when a car drove by and someone asked him where he was from, then shot him to death. Police said. 'Where are you from' is a common gang challenge."

Though the report avoided to talk of what gang was it, I know what it is from former news. Salinas is the homebase of Nuestra Familia. I remembered in a web site (Kerrang.com) I was asked repeatedly "Where are you from?" recently. Is that a coincidence? I don't think so. It seems a preparation to paint me as a ganster if there is a shoot death. Though it sounds funny, it is an aggressive work of get onto the street.

These days I suffered heavy harassment in internet. Despite of various problems to read and post, I was once blocked from internet the whole afternoon. (I generally surf internet in the afternoon) I can feel the frustration of FBI. Their aggressive work made me write the above messages first. I'll continue with my opinion on sniper case in next message.

Reference: "Ex-prosecutor describes links between FBI, mob" (S.J.M.N. 12/6/2002)

"A former U.S. attorney in Boston told a congressional committee Thursday that he knew that some gangland informers were committing murders and that their FBI handlers had become personally involved with them. But he said he took no action because he was intimidated by the FBI.

"It would have precipitated World War 3 if I had tried to do anything about FBI informants," said the witness, Jeremiah T. O'sullivan, who was head of the New England Organized Crime Strike Force and then U.S. attorney in the 1970s and '80s."

104. Sniper case (2) (12/17)

(4) Rich homeless

When someone complained in internet that INS had released Malvo after he was arrested as an illegal immigrant, I had such a message: "Don't blame INS all the way. Malvo might have been recruited as an informant. Law enforcement agent used to use such kind of people as snitch. John doer2 in OKC bombing is a similar one, or now called Padilla."

Quote, "In particular, there has been ample information to indicate that Williams had significant connections to larger illegal resources or organizations.

Multiple Identities: .....
Extensive Travel: The Rev. Alan Archer, who runs the Lighthouse Mission homeless shelter where
Williams and Malvo often stayed, reported that Williams would often claim extreme poverty, and yet at times procure large quantities of cash and fly off to such destinations as the Caribbean, Florida on business, and to Denver and Salt Lake City for skiing. Archer said that Williams frequently took phone calls from travel agents, so his jet-setting was a regular affair. This kind of activity is highly indicative of the fact that Williams was part of some sort of international ring. He stated to several friends that he moved to Bellingham to be near the Canadian border, so he could quickly get out of the US if needed.
Immigrant Smuggling:...."

<http://www.centrexnews.com/columnists/skousen/2002/1101.html>

(5) Muhammad's life in Jamaica seemed to be a fairly good one: praying, jogging, adopted a son- Malvo.

Quote, "Muhammad seemed a model father. He prayed at home, stopped by his kids' Greenville Primary School and took them jogging every afternoon.

> Malvo lived with the family for about three months, and each morning donned khaki pants and a blue plaid tie to attend the Antigua and Barbuda Seventh-Day Adventist School. Muhammad introduced him as his son.

On frequent trips to the United States, Muhammad loaded up with blank CDs, batteries, things that can be high-priced on the island, and sold them to friends. He also weaved grand stories, telling a friend he had worked for the CIA and FBI, and that he had to return to the States periodically to give military training workshops."

<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/370-FBIntimidation/message/2430>

Do they more like informants for a powerful organization then the homeless as most paper saying? If you find all media reported conflict saying from government, (almost like a pre-trial) but rarely heard what suspects say or some other source? Anyone with common sense would know that which organization had the power to decide not to deport illegal immigrant and also were interested in penetration of smuggling society of illegal immigrants and the homeless society as well. I recognized that news report right away when I first read it. In my experience, G-lady (see #32, #47) often went to ski resort Tahoe around year 93. Because she is not a lady fond of sport, I at that time impressed that agents liked to entertain their informants when they had meeting. Now it looked like it's one of their culture. To have their train course at ski resorts.

(6) If you think Muhammad and Malvo were informants of Federal agency, then it's not difficult to understand why Federal prosecutor stopped the interrogation on first day after police were developing a rapport with Muhammad. Did they try to protect the right of Muhammad as they said later? Of course not. I think they were worrying Muhammad might reveal his identity of informant. FBI is notorious for abusing power, search and survey without warrant. Otherwise why didn't they stop the interrogation right from the begining? (Which is said lasted about 5 hours). And suspects used to confess in first interrogation when they were still in shock for the arrest and tell the truth.

Quote, "Yesterday, federal officials and Montgomery County law enforcement officials feuded about whether the discussions with Muhammad during his first day in custody had run their course, or whether they were curtailed by federal prosecutors."

"The tension yesterday was exacerbated by a report in the New York Times that quoted unnamed sources as saying that DiBiagio had forced state and federal investigators to stop talking to Muhammad just as they were developing a rapport with him."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2002Oct30.html

(7) Reference: Padilla

Padilla was born in 1970.

1978-1982: Attending Darwin Elementary.

August 1985: Arrest record starts when he's 14, and is charged as a juvenile in connection with a murder. Padilla and a buddy robbed and stabbed a drunk man. Padilla kicks the bleeding man in the head. He tells cops: "I felt like it." January 1989: Arrested for obstructing people on the street after he was caught flashing gang signs and wearing gang colors. Tells police he's a Latin Disciple.

February 1989: Arrested for battery after hitting a cop in the face after trying to swipe a doughnut.

January 1991: Arrested in Chicago for firing a .357-caliber Magnum out a window of building near where he was living.

October 1991: Now in Florida, arrested for road rage incident in suburban Fort Lauderdale. Padilla fired a silver .38-caliber revolver at another motorist but missed.

1992: He was released from jail.

1992-93: Works at a Taco Bell in Davie, Fla.

June 1994: Padilla files for name change with Broward County; changes name to just Ibrahim. Later begins referring to himself as Abdullah al Muhajir.

1993-94: Works maintenance at Coral Ridge Golf Course in Fort Lauderdale.

(There is no information about where Padilla was and what work he did in this period from the source. I think that's top secret for FBI.)
May 8, 2002: Arrested at O'Hare Airport.

JOSE PADILLA'S PAST via:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-terr12.html <http://>

Notice the owner of fast food restaurant Padilla worked for in 92-93 was a Muslin.
Also notice that Padilla quit his ganster's life after his release from jail in 92. And try to penetrate into Muslin society since then. I think he might have been recruited in the jail and start his undercover job on 92.

I realized him as an informant not only based on above information, but mainly on the situation he was arrested in this May. When Ashcroft announced Padilla's arrest in Moscow, he had his purpose. The internet immediately circulated that Padilla was identical to John Doer2 of OKC bombing. When they need excuse to start war on Iraq, they sacrifice their informant without hesitation. See other opinion of mine about Padilla at: Re 7. Padilla and OKC bombing (6/15) in "68. Ashcroft's revenge (5/31/02)".

Also review "6. Looter and scapegoat" to see how they sacrificed a black teenage to settle a burglary case. That teenage, I guess, would work as an informant in jail.


105. Sniper case (3) Dramatic turnaround (12/27)

(8) Information Federal want you know and not know

When the two were arrested, media were full of information that Muhammad was a specialist Marksman, that the rifle was from a gun shop of his living state, that he was linked to other gun murders. And even his former wife and his son were in news said he deserved deaths if he committed such crime. It was almost a pre-trial.

What we know is in Muhammad's first interrogation, he ranted and denied any connection to sniper case. He was brought into Federal custody just at the time when he intended to speak something. After about one week, DOJ dramatically dropped the initial 20 counts of Federal charges against him. Police said the trunk of Caprice is to small to fit him. Now all evidences turn to point to Malvo, and he admitted he did some shootings.

I think Muhammad and Malvo, as informants, were assigned to the sniper shooting sites. They thought they were doing routine job to solve sniper case, never dreamed of being framed as snipers themselves. The Caprice was their working car. After arrest, Muhammad was old enough to realize the seriousness of the situation, and was going to tell the truth. FBI, watching him all the time, stopped it at the right point. (I think in the train course in ski resort, a principle for informants is at any time, they shouldn't reveal their identity. Breaking the rule may face death penalty. Anyhow, Muhammad knew he would face death penalty too, if he wouldn't tell the truth. He chose not to be a scapegoat.) As the result, in that one week's custody, a compromise has reached, and there was a dramatical turnaround.

Malvo kept his mouth shut up during the first 5 hours' interrogation. A week later, he changed his manner after Federal handed them over to local police. In a 7 hours interrogation, he admitted he was the one who pulled the trigger. "Malvo was talkative, smiling, even bragging in response to indirect questions from investigators, sources said."(S.J.M.N.) A poster in internet said Malvo even sang during interrogation. What made him so happy for something would lead him to death penalty? It seems he was under influence of something. Or he was strongly trust the promise of FBI, believe they are the God? Anyway, the unusual behave of Malvo made his attorney, Arif, said "he needs a psychiatrist to evaluate Malvo because 'We're not certain what makes Mr. Malvo tick.'"
This interrogation was a questionable one. Muhammad and Malvo were transferred from Federal to local police in later afternoon. Peter Greenspan, who represented Muhammad, said, "All of this was so orchestrated so that they would get them to Virginia late in the afternoon when they couldn't get to court." Malvo's guardian, Petit, asked the police to stop the interrogation at 6p.m. A police commander agreed to pass on his request and then ordered him to leave. (S.J.M.N.)

When Federal wants to stop Muhammad telling the truth, they used the reason of his right to have a lawyer. Once when they want people to know what they want them to know, they orchestrated another interrogation. Though without a lawyer, this time the Federal didn't try to protect Malvo's right.

(9) Question and Answer

Q1. Some people argue that people heard the shots

A. I re-read the news. They are right. People heard the shots. No silencer was used.

Q2. Some people said Muhammad and Malvo are the suspects because the shooting stopped after they were arrested.

A. I don't think it can prove anything. If it's a framed case, the real sniper of course would stop shooting, otherwise they would prove the two were innocent.

Perpetrator(s) stop to mail anthrax letter. That doesn't mean they have been arrested. It only proves they stopped when mission is fulfiled. The former one was to push for the pass through of "Patriot Act" The later one was to push for the authorization of Iraq war power. FBI have trouble for incapacity of solving the anthrax case. So this time they prepare a scapegoat.

Q3. Some people said they have a Caprice, that it's trunk is spacious, and allowed man operating inside easily.

A. It seems contradictory to Police' conclusion. I have no experience with Caprice so I don't know which one is correct. There are two possibilities. Either there has been a compromise between the arrested two and Federal, so police lied to exclude Muhammad from shooting, or the trunk is really small. So far the authority's saying is it's too small to fit Muhammad.

And I still hold my opinion. The victims were in parking lot, or gas station, or at the entrance of the shop. Which were lighted area with a lot of traffic and customers. The Caprice couldn't be too near the sites because it thus would have been seen there was a big black hole in its back seat. And the operation to settle the big lump of back seat cushion will cause attention. It's not a van with closed area. It's a Sedan with glass window of four sides. In a situation that everybody kept alert, any sniper would have stayed far away from the crowd area. And even if the trunk is big, the deck must have been at the same level as other cars. If you lay at that level, see through a small hole about two feet away, your sight would be very limited and would be blocked by the body of other cars, the car parking along the roadside, on the parking lot, and the cars on the moving, even the bushes. The bullet path couldn't jump over the body of other cars. It's hard to imagine they could have done
so many successful shootings by a Caprice without been discovered.