Israel numer 2

[Aaron2]

Unfortunately Israel is only an
american offshoot and therefore a
threat to the whole region, to its
own people and especially to judaism
itself. Any israelian artrosities
commited on the arab peoples are just
increasing the profits of cyonists(which cannot be jews) an norman-anglo-saxon capitalists and imperialists.

The Norman-Agnglo-Saxon imperialists
(USA UK Australia Canada NZ) are a
threat to world peace and the new
scourge of Yehova/God. Their plan is
to transform my Country to a second
israel against the neighboring muslim
people, especially Azeri which cannot
be in the Armenian Interest.
One american offshoot is enough.

[imported_grafix]

Originally posted by Aaron2
The Norman-Agnglo-Saxon imperialists
(USA UK Australia Canada NZ) are a
threat to world peace and the new
scourge of Yehova/God.

I beg your pardon?
Canada is NOT an imperialist country, and her history in peacekeeping is a testament to this.
I suggest you provide proof before you label countries.

[Mamie]

excuse me?? but just who have we Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders taken over??

if you are talking about the British Empire say so! Idiot.

[Aaron2]

First of all, the word idiot contains the word idios
which describes the charecteristic "self-sensed",
that means somone whoose so called "common-sense"
has been more sesibilized.
So far i understand this as a complement to mine,
although it was not meant this way. LOL

Sequal to this, when i am using words like expansionism
or imperialism i do not attack the population but the
establishment of a country or a collection of countries.

Canada is also responsible for artrosities against
humanity (the native population).OK, of course in a
little lower order of magnitude compared to America .

The Problem for the non-anglo bigger part of Europe is
that the collection of countries as a whole, mentioned in
my former posting, share a huge set of common (so called)
strategeic interests. Anyone can check this out on pages
like "The Centralinstitute for Strategic and International
Studies of the United States of America" (www.csis.org)
or like "The International Institute for Strategic Studies of the United Kingdom" (www.iiss.org) or the corresponding
pages of Canada, Australia(especially with regard to iraq
but this is another topic) and of course the fellows in NZ.

The more peacefully a rich country seems, the more smart
has its strategic papers(which often include crimes against
humanity) to be. A am sorry to tell you that.
Canada is anything else but a peaceful country,OK.

[imported_grafix]

Aaron;
Your statements are nothing but 'theories, and in order to prove them you need facts. So dish out some facts and prove to us why you think canada is not a peaceful country, because I'm not buying your arguments.

In regards to Canada's native population...
Canada has recognized her mistakes a long time ago and has taken steps to rectify it. Even though the government cannot compensate for the losses suffered in the past by the native population as a result of its policies, it is definitely taking the necesary steps to ensure todays native population does not suffer.

For instance, canada has laws and programs which ensure the native population today succeeds. It gives out grants, loans on a regular basis to the native population. In fact the funding for native populations is quite significant.

For instance, if a native person wants to start a business, he/she does not need to get a bank loan and pay it back with interest like the rest of us canadians do. The government provides the money, and expects no payment in return. The government simply asks that the person show a %20 profit. Now I would LOVE to have my financers show me the same flexibility!

Also: Native cultural groups are funded by the gov't, there are special grants in place for native artists, and we're talking about huge amounts. If another canadian artist wants to start up in life, they have to earn the money to buy the equipment necessary. whereas natives simply apply for a grant, receive a huge cash grant, and buy all the equipment they need.

The Government funds the Aboriginial Peoples Television which spends millions and millions of dollars yearly on native programs produced by native peoples.

Natives have tax-exempt status, and pay no taxes. There are government employees whose job it is to seek out applicants and hand them money so they can start their own businesses. We're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars here, not just little amounts.

I can continue on with the examples, but I believe I have made my case.

So now it's your turn Aaron. Prove to us that Canada is NOT a peaceful country, and DON'T use the native card because canada is the ONLY country on the American continent which has taken such EXTREME steps and measures to COMPENSATE for her mistakes in the past.

[Aaron2]

First of all, Canada in analogon to Russia
(just in this case, ok) claims to protect the rights
of the native population.

What is left out of the native people in the autonomous
regions in russia(or canada) is a cultural-russofied
(cultural anglofied) pseudo-native population.

On the one hand big companies make profits of billions
of dollars(or trillions of rubels) in "using" the
natural resources of canada(or analog russia(siberia))
and just spending a "few" millons (that is three orders
of magnitudes lower with respect to the base 10) to the
population. A little bit of folklore(native music),
teach them a little bit of their language(in primary
school) and anything is fine, hmmmm?

What should be done is to teach them anything in their
own language(even in the university).
Culture and Language walk hand in hand.
Only when a population is educated in its own language
it really FEELS free and IS free and does not feel
inferior to the people of the suppressors.
As an armenian I know that from the SovietTimes.
This is a question of psychology.
It costs a lot, I know, but this is the problem of the
canadian treasury, not mine. Pay it all back.

In the next step, create independent states(or a
federation of states) with theese different languages
as the official languages.

Give them enough cash and the administrative, technological
and political know-how to rule themself.

That is what i call a solution and real decolonialization.
--------------------------------------------------------
But I was talking about common (geo)strategical interests
of theese five nations which have less to to with inner
politics and more with foreign politics, OK.